WWII Operation Iwo Jima [Quenched]

Jack0827 · Post by **Jack0827** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:28 pm

I will go with Cassar. I think that the collers look fine

Arcanos · Post by **Arcanos** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 1:24 pm

I agree with andy that the title font is a little too condensed, but i think th map is looking nice

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 4:31 pm

A country - 2
B country - 3
5th M D - 2
4th M D - 3
109 infantry D - 6
air fields - 7

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:54 pm

Ruben Casar
A country - 2
B country - 2
5th M D - 2
4th M D - 2
109 infantry D - 5
air fields - 6

Molacole
A country - 2
B country - 2
5th M D - 2
4th M D - 2
109 infantry D - 6
air fields - 9

Wisse
A country - 2
B country - 3
5th M D - 2
4th M D - 3
109 infantry D - 6
air fields - 7

Now i have 3 bonus opinion, and if you agree i can open vote pool, and every body can vote for these 3 bonuses

DiM · Post by **DiM** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 9:59 pm

i like this one:

Code: Select all

A country - 2 
B country - 2 
5th M D - 2 
4th M D - 2 
109 infantry D - 5 
air fields - 6

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:15 am

Here map(these map dont be change, becouse i still work in change litle things, like barriers, and bonus box)

And here propose bonuses.
A

A country - 2
B country - 2
5th M D - 2
4th M D - 2
109 infantry D - 5
air fields - 6

B

A country - 2
B country - 2
5th M D - 2
4th M D - 2
109 infantry D - 6
air fields - 9

C

A country - 2
B country - 3
5th M D - 2
4th M D - 3
109 infantry D - 6
air fields - 7

Ruben Cassar · Post by **Ruben Cassar** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 12:24 pm

Note that you inverted the order of the bonus choices from the previous page. (Molacole's was the first choice and now my suggestion is the first). I hope this does not confuse the respondents...

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 1:04 pm

I put in that way that people vote for opinion not to vote for people who sugested these opinion.

Ruben Cassar · Post by **Ruben Cassar** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 1:48 pm

qwert wrote:I put in that way that people vote for opinion not to vote for people who sugested these opinion.

You changed the order. I am not speaking about who suggested it. I don't think I will manage to communicate this to you though.

Perhaps you should put the map and the choices on page 1 and redirect the poll there so that people will find the options even when this page is filled with posts...

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:25 pm

Qwert, could you make a few borders clearer? I've noticed you got some '4 corner borders'...I.E.

Can Orange 1 attack Nishi

Can White 1 attack A

Can Purple 1 attack 5th MD

Can 4th MD attack Red 2

Can Blue 2 attack Minami

If not, make it clearer that they don't touch. The corner points touching can be deceiving in maps.

--Andy

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:51 pm

seems like much people prefered mine

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:55 pm

Yes, i change order to Ruben.
People know where these Bonus pool option present, if you can see in title wrote (Page 18) And these post its first in all page.

No problem Andy,i just waith to vote end(these its 1 day of vote) and whene these finish i will present map with bonuses, and with new bonus box.
Wisse its only begining of vote.

I want to wrote number of these page but i see Emotion body not number.

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 3:18 pm

qwert wrote:Yes, i change order to Ruben.
People know where these Bonus pool option present, if you can see in title wrote (Page 18) And these post its first in all page.

No problem Andy,i just waith to vote end(these its 1 day of vote) and whene these finish i will present map with bonuses, and with new bonus box.
Wisse its only begining of vote.

I want to wrote number of these page but i see Emotion body not number.

i know

Ruben Cassar · Post by **Ruben Cassar** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:05 pm

Wisse wrote:seems like much people prefered mine

Yes, and to be honest with you (not that I am not honest usually!

) I am a bit pissed off because according to the borders and attack routes the one that I proposed (A) was the most logical option.

Heck I even explained why I chose those bonuses. Ehh the disappointments of life I guess...am I misunderstood?

Molacole · Post by **Molacole** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 5:43 pm

Ruben Cassar wrote:
Wisse wrote:seems like much people prefered mine

Yes, and to be honest with you (not that I am not honest usually! ) I am a bit pissed off because according to the borders and attack routes the one that I proposed (A) was the most logical option.

Heck I even explained why I chose those bonuses. Ehh the disappointments of life I guess...am I misunderstood?

I would've chosen yours before option C. What are people thinking with having the same exact amount of territories and the same exact amount of borders be different bonuses..

People voting for this obviously don't understand balance...

with the current popular vote this map is going to be ruined...

grab 4rth marine division and 5th marine division and you have
2 borders-9 territories for a +5 :roll:

grab plan A and plan B you have
2 borders-11 territories for a +5 :lol:

OK what am I missing because no matter how you look at this it just doesn't make any sense at all. Only way I could make sense of this would be if air fields and 109th were going to actually be faught over, but seeing as they're WAY too big to grab and hold nobody in their right mind is going to focus a strategy around holding those. So target B actually only has 2 threats and the same goes for 4rth division.

only 10 people have voted on this map so you might want to let it go longer.

fluffybunnykins · Post by **fluffybunnykins** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:05 pm

So target B actually only has 2 threats and the same goes for 4rth division. Confused

Thing is, even if noone is holdiing the whole continent, there could still be a threat from that direction...
I'd go for a combination of A & C (especially having run the figures through my own formula and come out pretty close to this):-
A) 2
B) 3
5th) 2
4th) 3
109) 6
AFs) 7

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:42 pm

Fluffy
I'd go for a combination of A & C (especially having run the figures through my own formula and come out pretty close to this):-
A) 2
B) 3
5th) 2
4th) 3
109) 6
AFs) 7

These its C

Molacole
only 10 people have voted on this map so you might want to let it go longer.

Ofcourse, Maybe 4 more days,Agree

everywhere116 · Post by **everywhere116** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:48 pm

Can you make it clearer what tunnels and anti-tank barriers do. I am having a hard time figuring that out.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:54 pm

You can atack terittory where tunnels go.
Anti tank and infantry barriers, its impasabile borders, you can cross these borders.

fluffybunnykins · Post by **fluffybunnykins** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 7:05 pm

These its C

duh! so it is!
I vote c then!

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 7:58 pm

No problem fluffy, its you decision. :wink:

everywhere116 · Post by **everywhere116** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:08 pm

qwert wrote:You can atack terittory where tunnels go.
Anti tank and infantry barriers, its impasabile borders, you can cross these borders.

Is it every territorry along that line, or just at the circles? Also, are the barriers one way?

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:15 pm

These line its tunnels way, and circle its exit, and you can atack only where its exit.
Barriers its one way, but i will put bouth side to be more understanding.

everywhere116 · Post by **everywhere116** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 9:13 pm

Ok. You will get many complaints if that isnt on the map.

boberz · Post by **boberz** » Mon Mar 12, 2007 6:02 am

i still wouldnt play it as it looks so confusing, the legend is very crowded and names look squashed in