Moderator: Cartographers

No. Willie, Hank, Ozzie, and Jackie (if Jackie Robinson, not Jackie Hayes) were all African American players. Racial integration in professional sports was kind of a big deal...natty_dread wrote:Does this address all problems?




Agreed on both counts. If we're going to be so particular as to make Babe left-handed we can certainly include other subtle details like Willie Mays' skin color.ghirrindin wrote:To be sure, the players do seem like cookie-cutter icons. But yes, I think, at least, acknowledging race and the struggle against oppression and for racial justice and equality seems necessary and appropriate given the sport's history. Also, I don't feel comfortable with Jackie Robinson, Willie Mays or others represented as white men. That's just wrong.
How do they look with army numbers right now? If it's awkward, we might want to find some way to put the army number a bit off to the side anyway and then you can make any pose you please.natty_dread wrote: I would like to remind you all, that the players are not just visual candy, they need to function as territories, and will be partially obscured by army numbers.
Oh, please. I'm not asking for a radical change; for the most part the map's fine. However, there's no reason why the current icons can't tastefully acknowledge the fact that Ozzie, Jackie, Hank, and Willie were/are black men. The history of baseball (and US, arguably) is defined by race and race relations, and it is the duty of any map, which takes baseball as its subject and legitimizes itself with the names of great African American players, to not whitewash a history of racial struggles. With the names you got now, I'm trying to say that those icons aren't, in fact, "generic baseball players" with neutral histories that you can blissfully ignore.carlpgoodrich wrote:I think you should either use the exact same icon for all the players or make a unique "cookie-cutter" icon for each (along the lines that were being discussed earlier: diving, running, etc.). I don't like the idea of using the same icons and just changing the color of a few... either the icons represent unique individuals or they are just generic baseball players whose names happen to coincide with actual players. To put it a different way, Jackie and Willie's names are being used in this map because of a lot more than just their race.
Exactly. Thank you. I'm happy to see the mapmakers pliant on the matter.Evil DIMwit wrote:Agreed on both counts. If we're going to be so particular as to make Babe left-handed we can certainly include other subtle details like Willie Mays' skin color.


You completely missed my point. I was saying that we were either making these generic baseball players (in which case they should all look the same, whether their skin tone is light, dark, or some funky bluish purplish I could care less) or we are trying to make them represent actual people (in which case there are a number of defining characteristics for each player and including more than just a binary representation of their skin color might be appropriate).ghirrindin wrote:Oh, please. I'm not asking for a radical change; for the most part the map's fine. However, there's no reason why the current icons can't tastefully acknowledge the fact that Ozzie, Jackie, Hank, and Willie were/are black men. The history of baseball (and US, arguably) is defined by race and race relations, and it is the duty of any map, which takes baseball as its subject and legitimizes itself with the names of great African American players, to not whitewash a history of racial struggles. With the names you got now, I'm trying to say that those icons aren't, in fact, "generic baseball players" with neutral histories that you can blissfully ignore.carlpgoodrich wrote:I think you should either use the exact same icon for all the players or make a unique "cookie-cutter" icon for each (along the lines that were being discussed earlier: diving, running, etc.). I don't like the idea of using the same icons and just changing the color of a few... either the icons represent unique individuals or they are just generic baseball players whose names happen to coincide with actual players. To put it a different way, Jackie and Willie's names are being used in this map because of a lot more than just their race.
Exactly. Thank you. I'm happy to see the mapmakers pliant on the matter.Evil DIMwit wrote:Agreed on both counts. If we're going to be so particular as to make Babe left-handed we can certainly include other subtle details like Willie Mays' skin color.

Look, I'm not going to get into a genital waving competition with you, but suffice it to say, you've missed completely my point. My point is that you can't "generically" encode baseball players as white, when those players were in fact African American. To do so would to simultaneously erase and reiterate a painful history of racial exclusion in the United States, as well as Black Americans' fight against that racism. I don't think there's any question that the names are referring to African Americans - Hank Aaron, Willie Mays, Jackie Robinson, and Ozzie Smith - and their race should be fully signified on the map. Furthermore, changing the skin tone on those icons was such an easy correction (many thanks, by the way) that I am actually very suspicious that you're so resistant to this change. This is not 1946. Racial integration in baseball happened.carlpgoodrich wrote:You completely missed my point. I was saying that we were either making these generic baseball players (in which case they should all look the same, whether their skin tone is light, dark, or some funky bluish purplish I could care less) or we are trying to make them represent actual people (in which case there are a number of defining characteristics for each player and including more than just a binary representation of their skin color might be appropriate).ghirrindin wrote:Oh, please. I'm not asking for a radical change; for the most part the map's fine. However, there's no reason why the current icons can't tastefully acknowledge the fact that Ozzie, Jackie, Hank, and Willie were/are black men. The history of baseball (and US, arguably) is defined by race and race relations, and it is the duty of any map, which takes baseball as its subject and legitimizes itself with the names of great African American players, to not whitewash a history of racial struggles. With the names you got now, I'm trying to say that those icons aren't, in fact, "generic baseball players" with neutral histories that you can blissfully ignore.carlpgoodrich wrote:I think you should either use the exact same icon for all the players or make a unique "cookie-cutter" icon for each (along the lines that were being discussed earlier: diving, running, etc.). I don't like the idea of using the same icons and just changing the color of a few... either the icons represent unique individuals or they are just generic baseball players whose names happen to coincide with actual players. To put it a different way, Jackie and Willie's names are being used in this map because of a lot more than just their race.
Exactly. Thank you. I'm happy to see the mapmakers pliant on the matter.Evil DIMwit wrote:Agreed on both counts. If we're going to be so particular as to make Babe left-handed we can certainly include other subtle details like Willie Mays' skin color.
With all the discussion of these icons, why not just go back to the baseball cap? That will eliminate any confusion about connectivity and would be more in line with the pitchers, who are just gloves.


The 9th player is the pitcher, which is represented off of the map. In the field, the second baseman usually plays between 1st and 2nd- until the ball is in play or a runner gets on second base- which is right where the player is positioned on the map.isaiah40 wrote:shouldn't there be a 9th player on the field? Like maybe 2nd base?
Are you using a laptop by any chance?Army of GOD wrote:I was gonna mention the sand. It looks more like gray clay to me (which, some fields do have gray clay, but brown sand is more professional).

MarshalNey wrote:The 9th player is the pitcher, which is represented off of the map. In the field, the second baseman usually plays between 1st and 2nd- until the ball is in play or a runner gets on second base- which is right where the player is positioned on the map.
Marshal Ney
Yea, that's probably whynatty_dread wrote:Are you using a laptop by any chance?Army of GOD wrote:I was gonna mention the sand. It looks more like gray clay to me (which, some fields do have gray clay, but brown sand is more professional).

