Moderator: Tournament Directors
Side note. The tourney organizer can not be held accountable for this...whakamole wrote:i'm in
but i'm pretty sure i'm going to shoot myself for agreeing to play in this madnessi do like the idea though
This isn't Madness...it's MIDDLE AGES. C'mon whak...it says it right there!whakamole wrote:i'm in
but i'm pretty sure i'm going to shoot myself for agreeing to play in this madnessi do like the idea though
To be honest, I don't want to track what order everyone finished but I'll change it to be an arbitrary draw of second place finishers in the games. If there isn't enough, then we'll go to players who finish third and so on.Robespierre__ wrote:It would seem better to award points in each game for the order you are ousted and allow the non-winners with the most points to advance rather than an arbitrary draw.

Could you please clarify the sentence in red?patrickaa317 wrote:The 8 advancing players will play each other until someone wins 2 games (multiple games will be sent at a time, game numbers will determine priority if two players win 2 games at the same time). That person will be crowned champion.
Lindax wrote:Could you please clarify the sentence in red?patrickaa317 wrote:The 8 advancing players will play each other until someone wins 2 games (multiple games will be sent at a time, game numbers will determine priority if two players win 2 games at the same time). That person will be crowned champion.
Is it the highest game number, the lowest, the one that ends in an even number....?
Lx