Moderator: Community Team
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
ThisSymmetry wrote:Stupidity? Sure.
Religious stupidity? Not so sure.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
I can't imagine how the word "uterus" could be considered offensive unless it was in reference to being a "dirty part". Do you really believe that he's against "uterus" for any other reason? I'd like to hear it.Symmetry wrote:Stupidity? Sure.
Religious stupidity? Not so sure.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
The word UTERUS isn't tactful? What the hell else is he gonna call it that would be MORE tactful? I can think of nothing offhand.pancakemix wrote:That's not necessarily religious though. It could have easily had to do with the fact that there was a much less pointed and much more tactful was of making that point. After all, it is a meeting of state congress. I'd expect an elected official to operate with at least a little more self respect (though that might be expecting too much). I'd say a reprimand was deserved, but it was gone about the wrong way.
The word "uterus" isn't my point of contention. What I'm getting at is that the whole example itself was uncalled for. If you're going to make a reference to that part of the anatomy, then yes, that is the best way to go about it. But was it necessary? Did he have to mention a uterus? Aren't there better examples he could've used? Not to mention that he's bringing a whole other issue into the discussion by referencing abortion.Woodruff wrote:The word UTERUS isn't tactful? What the hell else is he gonna call it that would be MORE tactful? I can think of nothing offhand.pancakemix wrote:That's not necessarily religious though. It could have easily had to do with the fact that there was a much less pointed and much more tactful was of making that point. After all, it is a meeting of state congress. I'd expect an elected official to operate with at least a little more self respect (though that might be expecting too much). I'd say a reprimand was deserved, but it was gone about the wrong way.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
It's an appropriate reference, given that for the largest part, Republicans want to regulate people but not businesses.pancakemix wrote:The word "uterus" isn't my point of contention. What I'm getting at is that the whole example itself was uncalled for. If you're going to make a reference to that part of the anatomy, then yes, that is the best way to go about it. But was it necessary? Did he have to mention a uterus? Aren't there better examples he could've used? Not to mention that he's bringing a whole other issue into the discussion by referencing abortion.Woodruff wrote:The word UTERUS isn't tactful? What the hell else is he gonna call it that would be MORE tactful? I can think of nothing offhand.pancakemix wrote:That's not necessarily religious though. It could have easily had to do with the fact that there was a much less pointed and much more tactful was of making that point. After all, it is a meeting of state congress. I'd expect an elected official to operate with at least a little more self respect (though that might be expecting too much). I'd say a reprimand was deserved, but it was gone about the wrong way.
You're trolling Woody. There's no mention of religion in that link.Woodruff wrote:You can't say WHAT? http://www.change.org/petitions/tell-sp ... t&opt_fb=f
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
I'm not at all trolling. Explain for me the reason for making this rule that the term "uterus" could not be used then, if not religion?sheepofdumb wrote:You're trolling Woody. There's no mention of religion in that link.Woodruff wrote:You can't say WHAT? http://www.change.org/petitions/tell-sp ... t&opt_fb=f
Did you even read the article? It's pretty obvious that Cannon was throwing Randolph a curveball. It's a classic scarecrow move. "Let's get his mind off what I'm doing and on to something completely trivial". Reading a move and going five steps ahead of the logic leads you to many frightening places. Keep your feet on the ground and get your head out of the clouds. It's making you look quite silly Woody.Woodruff wrote:I'm not at all trolling. Explain for me the reason for making this rule that the term "uterus" could not be used then, if not religion?sheepofdumb wrote:You're trolling Woody. There's no mention of religion in that link.Woodruff wrote:You can't say WHAT? http://www.change.org/petitions/tell-sp ... t&opt_fb=f
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
pcm & sheep-1Woodruff wrote:I'm not at all trolling. Explain for me the reason for making this rule that the term "uterus" could not be used then, if not religion?sheepofdumb wrote:You're trolling Woody. There's no mention of religion in that link.Woodruff wrote:You can't say WHAT? http://www.change.org/petitions/tell-sp ... t&opt_fb=f
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
I'm rather thinking this post might be in my favor, unintentionally. <grin>TA1LGUNN3R wrote:pcm & sheep-1Woodruff wrote:I'm not at all trolling. Explain for me the reason for making this rule that the term "uterus" could not be used then, if not religion?sheepofdumb wrote:You're trolling Woody. There's no mention of religion in that link.Woodruff wrote:You can't say WHAT? http://www.change.org/petitions/tell-sp ... t&opt_fb=f
woodyruff-0
hteser whas no mentions of anything religious there. don't getme wrong, i pretyty anyti-relgioius, but that's' stretching a biet.
No.Woodruff wrote:I'm rather thinking this post might be in my favor, unintentionally. <grin>TA1LGUNN3R wrote:pcm & sheep-1Woodruff wrote:I'm not at all trolling. Explain for me the reason for making this rule that the term "uterus" could not be used then, if not religion?sheepofdumb wrote:You're trolling Woody. There's no mention of religion in that link.Woodruff wrote:You can't say WHAT? http://www.change.org/petitions/tell-sp ... t&opt_fb=f
woodyruff-0
hteser whas no mentions of anything religious there. don't getme wrong, i pretyty anyti-relgioius, but that's' stretching a biet.
Brilliant reparte!TA1LGUNN3R wrote:No.Woodruff wrote:I'm rather thinking this post might be in my favor, unintentionally. <grin>TA1LGUNN3R wrote:pcm & sheep-1Woodruff wrote:I'm not at all trolling. Explain for me the reason for making this rule that the term "uterus" could not be used then, if not religion?sheepofdumb wrote: You're trolling Woody. There's no mention of religion in that link.
woodyruff-0
hteser whas no mentions of anything religious there. don't getme wrong, i pretyty anyti-relgioius, but that's' stretching a biet.
Well why climb over the fence when I can go through the gate?Woodruff wrote:Brilliant reparte!TA1LGUNN3R wrote:No.Woodruff wrote:I'm rather thinking this post might be in my favor, unintentionally. <grin>TA1LGUNN3R wrote:pcm & sheep-1Woodruff wrote:
I'm not at all trolling. Explain for me the reason for making this rule that the term "uterus" could not be used then, if not religion?
woodyruff-0
hteser whas no mentions of anything religious there. don't getme wrong, i pretyty anyti-relgioius, but that's' stretching a biet.
Recognizing that you're now posting coherently, I will only say that in your previous state, going through the gate was probably your only effective option. <chuckle>TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Well why climb over the fence when I can go through the gate?Woodruff wrote:Brilliant reparte!TA1LGUNN3R wrote:No.Woodruff wrote:I'm rather thinking this post might be in my favor, unintentionally. <grin>TA1LGUNN3R wrote: pcm & sheep-1
woodyruff-0
hteser whas no mentions of anything religious there. don't getme wrong, i pretyty anyti-relgioius, but that's' stretching a biet.
I would say he is opposed because he is a prick/prude, whatever. While he no doubt is a religious conservative, such a prohibition is not part of any religion I know. (the opposite, yes, but not the prohibition)Woodruff wrote:I can't imagine how the word "uterus" could be considered offensive unless it was in reference to being a "dirty part". Do you really believe that he's against "uterus" for any other reason? I'd like to hear it.Symmetry wrote:Stupidity? Sure.
Religious stupidity? Not so sure.