USA Downgraded

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

When Should USA Stop Taking on More Debt?

 
Total votes: 0

User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by Phatscotty »

PLAYER57832 wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:QE3 has been rejected?
so far, yes.
Let's clarify. You believe them (the same people who said they would never do QE1) when they say they won't QE3. I laugh when they say QE3 is rejected. :lol: :lol:

Perhaps there are a few stones in the past you should turn up to seek the truth and the reality of QE and what has been said about it in the past.
There IS no QE 3 :roll:
I know :lol:

All along, I have been saying "there will be" :roll:

you really can be impossible sometimes Player
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by Phatscotty »

Oh, Hello! My name is QE3. I'm on my way! Can't wait to meet you! I am sorry to hear that after a downgrade of the USA's credit rating, you doubted that I would come back for a 3rd try. I guess you don't like my stimulus. Oh well....Toodles!

I don't wait for something to happen and then try to make sense of it. I make sense of it and then expect something to happen. QE3 is coming, and I bet my left testicle on it.

For now, we just have to settle for what people are anticipating, and why.
“QE3 may be coming after all.”

That opening line from a new CNBC article says it all: experts are now predicting that the country’s economic woes will likely be used to justify a new round of quantitative easing (which is essentially the government printing money to buy its own bonds). It would be the third round in recent memory, hence the name QE3.

“In a dramatic turnabout, market participants now believe the Federal Reserve is more likely than not to resume purchasing assets during the next year in a third round of quantitative easing,” CNBC says regarding its August Fed Survey.

“There is no doubt that over the last week the odds of seeing another round of asset purchases has risen significantly,” Tom Porcelli, chief US economist at RBC Capital Markets, told CNBC. “This doesn’t mean we think it will have any more success than QE2. What this simply reflects is a Fed with few remaining options.”

The survey polled 60 different economists, stock and bond strategists, and portfolio managers
Word of the day: Reverse Repurchase Agreement.

If you’d like to better understand quantitative easing, here is a tutorial video

Image

Image
User avatar
jbrettlip
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Ft. Worth, TX

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by jbrettlip »

a reverse repurchase agreement is a way for the fed to deleverage its balance sheet. It would be the opposite of QE3, and is one of the tools that would actually raise short term rates. When they have traded in this style with primary dealers and money market funds, rates were set higher (15-20) vs the normal market operations.
Image
nothing wrong with a little bit of man on dog love.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by Phatscotty »

jbrettlip wrote:a reverse repurchase agreement is a way for the fed to deleverage its balance sheet. It would be the opposite of QE3, and is one of the tools that would actually raise short term rates. When they have traded in this style with primary dealers and money market funds, rates were set higher (15-20) vs the normal market operations.
=D> =D> =D>
User avatar
jbrettlip
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Ft. Worth, TX

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by jbrettlip »

Phatscotty wrote:
jbrettlip wrote:a reverse repurchase agreement is a way for the fed to deleverage its balance sheet. It would be the opposite of QE3, and is one of the tools that would actually raise short term rates. When they have traded in this style with primary dealers and money market funds, rates were set higher (15-20) vs the normal market operations.
=D> =D> =D>
not bad for a drunk, huh?
Image
nothing wrong with a little bit of man on dog love.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by Phatscotty »

jbrettlip wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
jbrettlip wrote:a reverse repurchase agreement is a way for the fed to deleverage its balance sheet. It would be the opposite of QE3, and is one of the tools that would actually raise short term rates. When they have traded in this style with primary dealers and money market funds, rates were set higher (15-20) vs the normal market operations.
=D> =D> =D>
not bad for a drunk, huh?
How do you know this stuff? do you work in a certain sector or do you just read a lot/
User avatar
jbrettlip
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Ft. Worth, TX

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by jbrettlip »

Phatscotty wrote:
jbrettlip wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
jbrettlip wrote:a reverse repurchase agreement is a way for the fed to deleverage its balance sheet. It would be the opposite of QE3, and is one of the tools that would actually raise short term rates. When they have traded in this style with primary dealers and money market funds, rates were set higher (15-20) vs the normal market operations.
=D> =D> =D>
not bad for a drunk, huh?
How do you know this stuff? do you work in a certain sector or do you just read a lot/
Both.
Image
nothing wrong with a little bit of man on dog love.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by Phatscotty »

Tim Geitner - No risk' of AAA downgrade

White House response after downgrade- We NEED to keep Geitner!
User avatar
jbrettlip
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Ft. Worth, TX

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by jbrettlip »

Did you see the SEC investigation into S&P, and potential leaks....I bet Soros is named as a profiter of the downgrade. The Chicago way strikes again!!
Image
nothing wrong with a little bit of man on dog love.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by Phatscotty »

jbrettlip wrote:Did you see the SEC investigation into S&P, and potential leaks....I bet Soros is named as a profiter of the downgrade. The Chicago way strikes again!!
On the one hand, I find it impossible that the USA downgrade could be kept a secret for too long.

On the other hand, did you see Michael Moore said that Obama should arrest the CEO of SnP for downgrading us? Yes, for real.
User avatar
BigBallinStalin
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
Contact:

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by BigBallinStalin »

saxitoxin wrote:Finally, a voice of reason on deficit reduction issues:
  • Field Marshal Chen Binge, Chief of General Staff Headquarters of the Chinese People's Liberation Army:
    "The U.S. must slash its gigantic military expenditure and bloated social welfare costs and accept international supervision over U.S. dollar issues."
    http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2 ... ml?ref=rss
Field Marshal Binge is right. Just by withdrawing and demobilizing forces from the so-called "ROK" and Japan, mothballing all aircraft carriers operating in the Pacific out of San Diego and Seattle, terminating the US-Phillippines so-called "defence agreement" and shuttering the USAF's so-called signals intel facilities in Pine Gap, Australia, the U.S. could probably eliminate half the deficit in one swoop.
Ha, China would love for that to happen. No more competition in their immediate, potential sphere of influence would work well for them.
User avatar
BigBallinStalin
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
Contact:

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by BigBallinStalin »

Timminz wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
Timminz wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
jbrettlip wrote:Did anyone notice the fact that treasuries RALLIED Monday? Probably not, since people on here jsut make shit up and don't actually look at the real world.
Treasuries rallied, the stock market plummetted.
This is something I'm having trouble wrapping my head around. Why, upon news of the USA being less credit-worthy, are people leaving private investments, and moving towards more government bonds? It seems rather counter-intuitive to me.
Because the United States didn't default? I'm not sure.
I'm going to ask my finance professor, this evening. I will report back, if he has any idea, and no one else has clarified for us yet.
Image
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by Phatscotty »

Okay. I regret nobody has done this sooner, and if they have, hey....sorry.

Default = Not able to pay the interest on the debt
Revenues = 2.2 trillion/year

How did anybody sell the sloppy poo-doo that with 2.2 trillions dollars, we would be unable to pay the interest on our debt? There was never going to be a default. It was another scare tactic ala "If we don't bail these companies out, we're gonna have a depression in the next 30 seconds."
User avatar
jbrettlip
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Ft. Worth, TX

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by jbrettlip »

Phatscotty wrote:Okay. I regret nobody has done this sooner, and if they have, hey....sorry.

Default = Not able to pay the interest on the debt
Revenues = 2.2 trillion/year

How did anybody sell the sloppy poo-doo that with 2.2 trillions dollars, we would be unable to pay the interest on our debt? There was never going to be a default. It was another scare tactic ala "If we don't bail these companies out, we're gonna have a depression in the next 30 seconds."
We would have defaulted on all the government programs that we currently borrow to fund, though. And in a technical default rates would probably rise, so all retired debt would be reissued at a higher rate.

I think we may disagree on the bank bailouts, not the GM bailout.
Image
nothing wrong with a little bit of man on dog love.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by Phatscotty »

jbrettlip wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:Okay. I regret nobody has done this sooner, and if they have, hey....sorry.

Default = Not able to pay the interest on the debt
Revenues = 2.2 trillion/year

How did anybody sell the sloppy poo-doo that with 2.2 trillions dollars, we would be unable to pay the interest on our debt? There was never going to be a default. It was another scare tactic ala "If we don't bail these companies out, we're gonna have a depression in the next 30 seconds."
We would have defaulted on all the government programs that we currently borrow to fund, though. And in a technical default rates would probably rise, so all retired debt would be reissued at a higher rate.

I think we may disagree on the bank bailouts, not the GM bailout.
defaulting on something one does not have money for is inevitable, no? We are just digging ourselves deeper.

On a side note, I'm sure that the high possibility we are going to double dip recession had nothing to do with the downgrade.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by Woodruff »

Good to see this. Not that I think anything was necessarily going on, but it seems prudent to look into it:
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/business ... ade/41249/
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by Phatscotty »

Woodruff wrote:Good to see this. Not that I think anything was necessarily going on, but it seems prudent to look into it:
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/business ... ade/41249/
Chicago politics son
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by Woodruff »

Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Good to see this. Not that I think anything was necessarily going on, but it seems prudent to look into it:
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/business ... ade/41249/
Chicago politics son
You didn't even read the article, did you? Come on, Scotty...Michael Moore didn't write this one!
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
GreecePwns
Posts: 2656
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:19 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Lawn Guy Lint

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by GreecePwns »

1. Mystery man plops a billion dollars in the futures market betting against the US Bond market.
2. S&P downgrade just a day or two later.
3. Mystery man's money grows tenfold.

Coincedence? I think not.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by Phatscotty »

Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Good to see this. Not that I think anything was necessarily going on, but it seems prudent to look into it:
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/business ... ade/41249/
Chicago politics son
You didn't even read the article, did you? Come on, Scotty...Michael Moore didn't write this one!
I never read your articles

:twisted:

I looked at it, and realize I read it yesterday, and I read about it 6 days ago as well.

SnP downgrades gov't. Gov't launches probe of SnP. Chicago politics.
Last edited by Phatscotty on Mon Aug 15, 2011 12:20 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by Phatscotty »

GreecePwns wrote:1. Mystery man plops a billion dollars in the futures market betting against the US Bond market.
2. S&P downgrade just a day or two later.
3. Mystery man's money grows tenfold.

Coincedence? I think not.
George Soros much?
User avatar
jbrettlip
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Ft. Worth, TX

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by jbrettlip »

It is/was Soros. But the SEC will never name him. One of the reasons he took his hedge fund private, to escape regulation.

We are already in a recession. Wait till the numbers come out!
Image
nothing wrong with a little bit of man on dog love.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by PLAYER57832 »

Woodruff wrote:Good to see this. Not that I think anything was necessarily going on, but it seems prudent to look into it:
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/business ... ade/41249/
I am sure someone did this. Whether the S & P employees are guilty is another story.
User avatar
jbrettlip
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Ft. Worth, TX

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by jbrettlip »

PLAYER57832 wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Good to see this. Not that I think anything was necessarily going on, but it seems prudent to look into it:
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/business ... ade/41249/
I am sure someone did this. Whether the S & P employees are guilty is another story.
There are always "rumors" on the street. It is an efficient market. You usually won't need to wait for an official announcement to know something or trade on it. Whoever placed that big bet did nothing illegal, they didn't need inside info. It had been discussed openly for some time.
Image
nothing wrong with a little bit of man on dog love.
User avatar
Timminz
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: At the store

Re: USA Downgraded

Post by Timminz »

BigBallinStalin wrote:
Timminz wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
Timminz wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:Treasuries rallied, the stock market plummetted.
This is something I'm having trouble wrapping my head around. Why, upon news of the USA being less credit-worthy, are people leaving private investments, and moving towards more government bonds? It seems rather counter-intuitive to me.
Because the United States didn't default? I'm not sure.
I'm going to ask my finance professor, this evening. I will report back, if he has any idea, and no one else has clarified for us yet.
Image
Yeah, I totally dropped the ball on that one. I'll try to remember to ask him tomorrow.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”