Being born & raised in the Seattle are, I like it!
There are a lot of options here. You could include Bellevue, Mercer Island, the San Juan Islands (Orcas, Whidby, etc). Even the mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics). You could have a "downtown" area with a bonus. You could have the seven Seattle hills as territories (Queen Anne Hill, Beacon Hill, Capitol, Magnolia, etc).
The more I think about it, the cooler it gets! Run with it!
The Pro-Tip®, SkyDaddy® and are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
Ive been thinking about making all the bridges territories, so to attack another continent you would have to first attack the bridge, which wouldn't be part of any continent. What do you think.
While I dislike the idea of a map of Seattle, if it's going to go ahead I think the bridges is an excellent idea. Controlling a bridge(s) would have significant strategic value.
LOL, I got a kick out of this map, the names are funny as hell, I would definitely play this map cause i would laugh my a$$ off everytime i took toyota and more siberia, and a few other funny names, good stuff!! LMAO!!
I went and found a map of Ohio, divided it into regions, and colored it. I'm not sure what to do now. There are a total of 88 territories, and 8 regions. This might make a good 4 vs. 4 game, if that passes.
If someone could help me that would be great. I've only counted the number of territories in each region. I'm not sure how many bonus armies should be given out for each region. any help or suggestions would be appreciated.
Last edited by patt on Sat Apr 21, 2007 1:08 pm, edited 5 times in total.
i think its far to big :\ even for a large map. if u want a large number of countrys you'll need to compress it right down, like world 2.1.Saying that the playablility would be gd, a few barriers and rivers could make this an exciting map. I look forward to it and ill help in any way i can =)