[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Trying to access array offset on null [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null Will simtom get 0 points? - Conquer Club
s.xkitten wrote:if he does, he'll never be able to get any points again, cause you can't divide by zero
actually sk, I was wrong when I originally said that, as I forgot about team games. If he partners, he can get off zero. But he can't go negative and he's limited to 100 max points per player if he wins.
s.xkitten wrote:if he does, he'll never be able to get any points again, cause you can't divide by zero
actually sk, I was wrong when I originally said that, as I forgot about team games. If he partners, he can get off zero. But he can't go negative and he's limited to 100 max points per player if he wins.
s.xkitten wrote:if he does, he'll never be able to get any points again, cause you can't divide by zero
actually sk, I was wrong when I originally said that, as I forgot about team games. If he partners, he can get off zero. But he can't go negative and he's limited to 100 max points per player if he wins.
i was referring to non-team games...but good point and true...although, i'm not really sure who would want to team up with him...
s.xkitten wrote:if he does, he'll never be able to get any points again, cause you can't divide by zero
actually sk, I was wrong when I originally said that, as I forgot about team games. If he partners, he can get off zero. But he can't go negative and he's limited to 100 max points per player if he wins.
i was referring to non-team games...but good point and true...although, i'm not really sure who would want to team up with him...
IronE.GLE wrote:I think lack said something about a player that goes to zero automatically gets 1000 points back.
Nice imagination.
I guess so I checked the thread where I thought I had read that, and sure enough lack posted no such thing. I did read it somewhere, but perhaps it was just someone's suggestion.
There is no luck, only preparation and execution.
Alliances are for the weak, whimpering masses looking for someone to hold their hand through the storm.
I dont think he'll make 0 unless he starts playing team games (not his modus operandi) or plays in whatever the opposite to super elite games is, with other players who have scores of 40 or less.
Looking at the scoreboard at the moment it is scary how many players have sub-200 point scores. I can't conceive of how you could get a score that low without doing it on purpose.
Genghis Khan CA wrote:I dont think he'll make 0 unless he starts playing team games (not his modus operandi) or plays in whatever the opposite to super elite games is, with other players who have scores of 40 or less.
Looking at the scoreboard at the moment it is scary how many players have sub-200 point scores. I can't conceive of how you could get a score that low without doing it on purpose.
With so many people concerned about points, most of the time someone with such a low score will get picked on so that they have no chance of winning the game. Nobody wants to lose 20 points from their current score, let alone 80 or 100 points.
There is no luck, only preparation and execution.
Alliances are for the weak, whimpering masses looking for someone to hold their hand through the storm.
IronE.GLE wrote:With so many people concerned about points, most of the time someone with such a low score will get picked on so that they have no chance of winning the game. Nobody wants to lose 20 points from their current score, let alone 80 or 100 points.
Fair point, I must admit I hadn't thought of that because that's not the way I play. I still think there are enough players who wouldn't simply target the lowest ranked player to make my point valid though.
Just looked at the scoreboard and he's lost another 3 points. Then, I looked at his feedback and I am now convinced it is on purpose. He started off with a load of positives but has only had loads of negatives from deadbeating recently. Must be a new record for that too - he's got 31 (I think that's higher than dugcarr1 ). I still think he has a second account as a premium member...
nmhunate wrote:Speak English... It is the language that God wrote the bible in.
Genghis Khan CA wrote:Looking at the scoreboard at the moment it is scary how many players have sub-200 point scores. I can't conceive of how you could get a score that low without doing it on purpose.
Well, consider all the generals and colnels and whathave you. Where do you think they get their points from? These eople with less than 200points are doing the site a service