Too funny, good short read.Dako wrote:Reminds me the story of alot.

Moderator: Community Team


All that? Thats one of the smallest posts Ive ever made.Robinette wrote:AAFitz wrote:Certainly loulou could lose some loose in the loos...or on louFindolphin wrote:In the UK a toilet is aka a loo. The plural is loos. So one could let loose in the loo. Or maybe lose some loose in the loos.
Did you both really just say all that?
I think that makes you each a lou sir.
i agree, these kind of grammar errors are way worse to me too. they just means you don't understand what you're writting! also you forgot were/we're/whereoVo wrote:Isn't it... UR sowrite?
The your/you're/you are & were/we're/we are & there/their/they're/they are
is much worse than lose, loose and yoose.
Speeling is very problematic.
Augustin, the day I can write French as well as you write English is the day I will correct any spelling/grammer errors for you or any other multilingual person. I applaud your effort at communicatingbetiko wrote:i agree, these kind of grammar errors are way worse to me too. they just means you don't understand what you're writting! also you forgot were/we're/whereoVo wrote:Isn't it... UR sowrite?
The your/you're/you are & were/we're/we are & there/their/they're/they are
is much worse than lose, loose and yoose.
Speeling is very problematic.
and actually Ted, I think I've always made the mistake so hopefully now I ll remember it!


and possibly the 1st one i've actually read all the way throughAAFitz wrote:All that? Thats one of the smallest posts Ive ever made.Robinette wrote:AAFitz wrote:Certainly loulou could lose some loose in the loos...or on louFindolphin wrote:In the UK a toilet is aka a loo. The plural is loos. So one could let loose in the loo. Or maybe lose some loose in the loos.
Did you both really just say all that?
I think that makes you each a lou sir.



Robinette wrote:Depends on what metric you use...Kaskavel wrote:Seriously. Who is the female conqueror of CC?
The coolest is squishyg
I find using "there" as "their" and vice versa, and usig "then" as "than" are even worse than the "lose/loose" thing.tec805 wrote:Your brain is loose in your skull, which is why it rattles when you shake your head. You lose your mind when you roll poorly and lose your battle.
I can understand so many people spelling "your" when they meant "you're" or "were" instead of "we're" because I'm not a total grammer/spelling nazi, but come on folks, post after post I read "loose" (in some cases 3 or 4 times in one post!) and I think Webster is going to change the definition just to accommodate all the misspellers on this site!
As long as I'm bitching, did I mention my dice suck?
you forgot your/you'rePirlo wrote:I find using "there" as "their" and vice versa, and usig "then" as "than" are even worse than the "lose/loose" thing.
9 1/2 points to squishyg for spot-on-topic and funny!squishyg wrote:http://theoatmeal.com/comics/misspelling


Timminz wrote:You're mother kneads two looser lose ways, as apposed too bean lose alot.
to, too, and two, of course.DiM wrote:you forgot your/you'rePirlo wrote:I find using "there" as "their" and vice versa, and usig "then" as "than" are even worse than the "lose/loose" thing.
or like to say "these guy's are cool."Dukasaur wrote:to, too, and two, of course.DiM wrote:you forgot your/you'rePirlo wrote:I find using "there" as "their" and vice versa, and usig "then" as "than" are even worse than the "lose/loose" thing.
But what really drives me to the point of psychosis, is the its/it's thing. I can understand some of the others as laziness, but using "it's" in places where "its" belongs is actually anti-laziness: the use of an extra keystroke where it's not required. So if it's not laziness, it has to be stupidity.
i'm quite sure the next dictionary will indeed change the definition of loose. because it's really common, and i also can't understand why everyone keeps typing loose instead of lose. I have seen this for years, and it keeps getting worse. I mean, how hard is it, i think the difference between you're and your and we're and where and were etc. can be a little hard for non-native english speakers. but come on, how hard is it to understand the difference between loose and lose.tec805 wrote:Your brain is loose in your skull, which is why it rattles when you shake your head. You lose your mind when you roll poorly and lose your battle.
I can understand so many people spelling "your" when they meant "you're" or "were" instead of "we're" because I'm not a total grammer/spelling nazi, but come on folks, post after post I read "loose" (in some cases 3 or 4 times in one post!) and I think Webster is going to change the definition just to accommodate all the misspellers on this site!
As long as I'm bitching, did I mention my dice suck?
Surprisingly little.Robinette wrote:Timminz wrote:You're mother kneads two looser lose ways, as apposed too bean lose alot.
hahahaa.... excellent!!!
so just how much time did you spend on that?
Its the phonetics of it.zimmah wrote:i'm quite sure the next dictionary will indeed change the definition of loose. because it's really common, and i also can't understand why everyone keeps typing loose instead of lose. I have seen this for years, and it keeps getting worse. I mean, how hard is it, i think the difference between you're and your and we're and where and were etc. can be a little hard for non-native english speakers. but come on, how hard is it to understand the difference between loose and lose.tec805 wrote:Your brain is loose in your skull, which is why it rattles when you shake your head. You lose your mind when you roll poorly and lose your battle.
I can understand so many people spelling "your" when they meant "you're" or "were" instead of "we're" because I'm not a total grammer/spelling nazi, but come on folks, post after post I read "loose" (in some cases 3 or 4 times in one post!) and I think Webster is going to change the definition just to accommodate all the misspellers on this site!
As long as I'm bitching, did I mention my dice suck?

jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Gillipig wrote:I lost to a loose player. He even had a screw loose.
Just because he said the player had a screw loose, doesn't automatically mean he was talking about you!pimpdave wrote:
As an American I can attest to the horrible grammar... Some of my favorite CC game arguments go something like this...nippersean wrote:
I'm not a grammer nasti either, nor a spammar passti. I think loose is just a NA thing due to educational deffinshies
This is a very heart warming story.KraphtOne wrote:As an American I can attest to the horrible grammar... Some of my favorite CC game arguments go something like this...nippersean wrote:
I'm not a grammer nasti either, nor a spammar passti. I think loose is just a NA thing due to educational deffinshies
Other idiot: whatever man your playing like a cook...
Kraphtone: It's "you're", you god damned moron...
at which point i usually begin to type out a speech explaining the irony of someone questioning my intelligence whilst failing to grasp basic grammatical fundamentals that my 6 year old niece understands... but then i remember Twain's advice about arguing with fools and I erase the chat and go take my anger out on loved ones...