Suggestions that have been archived.
Moderator: Community Team
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24935 Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:
Post
by AndyDufresne » Thu Jun 16, 2011 11:32 am
Is the first post an updated list of all the desired improvements? If not, could someone write up a post of their own and summarize for easy reference? --Andy
drunkmonkey
Posts: 1704 Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 5:00 pm
Post
by drunkmonkey » Thu Jun 16, 2011 11:37 am
To summarize,
Allow players to invite multiple players to a game from one screen Allow players to accept multiple game invites at once Allow players to withdraw invites from a game, instead of waiting until they expire or re-creating the game Incremental Invites e.g, 24, 48, 72 (Great for TO's) I believe this is the list of suggestions discussed.
Edit: Added incremental invites.
Last edited by
drunkmonkey on Thu Jun 16, 2011 12:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
rdsrds2120
Posts: 6274 Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:42 am
Gender: Male
Post
by rdsrds2120 » Thu Jun 16, 2011 12:00 pm
drunkmonkey wrote: To summarize,
Allow players to invite multiple players to a game from one screen Allow players to accept multiple game invites at once Allow players to withdraw invites from a game, instead of waiting until they expire or re-creating the game I believe this is the list of suggestions discussed.
Also:
Incremental Invites e.g, 24, 48, 72 (Great for TO's) -rd
drunkmonkey
Posts: 1704 Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 5:00 pm
Post
by drunkmonkey » Thu Jun 16, 2011 12:15 pm
rdsrds2120 wrote: drunkmonkey wrote: To summarize,
Allow players to invite multiple players to a game from one screen Allow players to accept multiple game invites at once Allow players to withdraw invites from a game, instead of waiting until they expire or re-creating the game I believe this is the list of suggestions discussed.
Also:
Incremental Invites e.g, 24, 48, 72 (Great for TO's) -rd
Added it to my list; thanks
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24935 Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:
Post
by AndyDufresne » Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:08 pm
Good work, thanks folks! I think these are some solid suggestions, and could make for an Invite 3.0 update. --Andy
Victor Sullivan
Posts: 6010 Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:17 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Columbus, OH
Contact:
Post
by Victor Sullivan » Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:16 pm
Very nice! I am quite fond of this suggestion. -Sully
rdsrds2120
Posts: 6274 Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:42 am
Gender: Male
Post
by rdsrds2120 » Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:16 am
Yes, it's definitely a plus to have not only new things implemented, but the improvement of ones that exist!
-rd
sniffie
Posts: 1715 Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 3:29 pm
Gender: Male
Post
by sniffie » Fri Jul 01, 2011 4:24 am
Great idea, would escpaccially work out for the tournament organizers. sniff
chapcrap
Posts: 9686 Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Gender: Male
Location: Kansas City
Post
by chapcrap » Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:35 pm
Wonder if this is getting any traction. This is a wonderful idea.
crazymilkshake5
Posts: 745 Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 4:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Georgia.
Post
by crazymilkshake5 » Sun Nov 20, 2011 3:59 pm
Concise description: So i get on this morning and i have 8 invites to games (not to many) and it took me like 5 mins to do, so i was thinking that it would be a good idea to have an accept all button when it comes to invitesSpecifics/Details: It would be in the invite tab and ya, thats basically all the details, lolHow this will benefit the site and/or other comments: It will make people happy, i know it will with me!
Last edited by
crazymilkshake5 on Thu May 03, 2012 9:40 pm, edited 3 times in total.
highscore
greenoaks
Posts: 9977 Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am
Post
by greenoaks » Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:25 pm
5 minutes is a long time. i right click each one and open them in a new tab. it takes me 5 seconds.
hmsps
Posts: 772 Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 2:23 pm
Gender: Male
Post
by hmsps » Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:45 pm
I think its a good idea and you should be able to multiple invite too
Highest score 3372 02/08/12 Highest position 53 02/08/12
codierose
Posts: 1561 Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 6:50 pm
Gender: Male
Location: RANDOMBULLSHIT.ORG
Contact:
Post
by codierose » Sun Nov 20, 2011 8:00 pm
cool good idea i get 20+ at a time
crazymilkshake5
Posts: 745 Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 4:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Georgia.
Post
by crazymilkshake5 » Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:04 pm
2 Positive one... um... other, lol
highscore
Darwins_Bane
Posts: 989 Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 7:09 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Post
by Darwins_Bane » Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:43 am
This has already been suggested multiple times before.
high score : 2294 02:59:29 ‹Khan22› wouldn't you love to have like 5 or 6 girls all giving you attention? 10/11/2010 02:59:39 ‹TheForgivenOne› No.
gimli1990
Posts: 364 Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 5:28 pm
Gender: Male
Location: USA
Post
by gimli1990 » Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:46 pm
i like this idea as there are times where i can only get on for a couple minutes it would be nice if i did not have to spend the whole time accepting invites for tourney's.
i love we finally got AA otherwise known now as trench YES!!!!! Highest Score: Major 2329
patrickaa317
Posts: 2269 Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 5:10 pm
Gender: Male
Post
by patrickaa317 » Sat Nov 26, 2011 3:10 am
greenoaks wrote: i right click each one and open them in a new tab. it takes me 5 seconds.
exactly. I can have 20 games accepted within 30 seconds. No reason to add coding.
taking a break from cc, will be back sometime in the future.
SirSebstar
Posts: 6969 Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:51 am
Location: SirSebstar is BACK. Highscore: Colonel Score: 2919 21/03/2011
Post
by SirSebstar » Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:13 am
accept all means you have no way to check the settings on each. and just adding coding for the same map with settings and players.. that looks futile.. not a bad idea in itself, but this suggestion needs a lot more thinking behind it.
blakebowling
Posts: 5093 Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:09 pm
Gender: Male
Location: 127.0.0.1
Post
by blakebowling » Mon Nov 28, 2011 3:12 pm
I still say the checkboxes idea is the best.
chapcrap
Posts: 9686 Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Gender: Male
Location: Kansas City
Post
by chapcrap » Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:37 am
blakebowling wrote: I still say the checkboxes idea is the best.
The Cook speaks the truth.
greenoaks
Posts: 9977 Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am
Post
by greenoaks » Tue Nov 29, 2011 6:21 am
blakebowling wrote: I still say the checkboxes idea is the best.
what page do you go to?
right now if the game is full you go to the Active tab but if it is still awaiting players to join you go to the Awaiting Players tab.
Ickyketseddie
Posts: 695 Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 6:00 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Midlands UK
Post
by Ickyketseddie » Tue Nov 29, 2011 7:34 am
To be honest if it didnt navigate you away from the invites tab everytime you accepted it'd be fine. Probably the quickest and easiest fix to put it?
chapcrap
Posts: 9686 Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Gender: Male
Location: Kansas City
Post
by chapcrap » Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:42 pm
Ickyketseddie wrote: To be honest if it didnt navigate you away from the invites tab everytime you accepted it'd be fine. Probably the quickest and easiest fix to put it?
So many options!! And yet, so little implementation...
blakebowling
Posts: 5093 Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:09 pm
Gender: Male
Location: 127.0.0.1
Post
by blakebowling » Wed Nov 30, 2011 6:50 am
Ickyketseddie wrote: To be honest if it didnt navigate you away from the invites tab everytime you accepted it'd be fine. Probably the quickest and easiest fix to put it?
Actually, this option would require identifiers to tell where games are joined from. IIRC the call for accepting an invitation and the call for joining a game are the same.
Ickyketseddie
Posts: 695 Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 6:00 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Midlands UK
Post
by Ickyketseddie » Wed Nov 30, 2011 7:54 am
Well i'm no coder by any means, i just assumed (obviously incorrectly) that there was a rule once a game is joined to view the awaiting page, which could be changed to default to the Invites page. If your saying changing this would just result in ,everytime you join any game getting sent to the invites screen, obviously this is no better. How much work is it to separate out the two?