Moderator: Community Team
Apologies if you took my post as an insult. It was in jest. The way you phrased it (is that the correct phrase? can you 'phrase' images?) was in a humorous way, too. If you actually cared about the comparison with history – Hitler > Sudetenland with Putin > Crimea, then I don't think you would have included the hosting of the Olympics.Juan_Bottom wrote:My brain is working fine, use yours before you insult me.
But what really surprises me is the number of apologists and pro-Russian aggression people here and elsewhere. I'm an American, and a Northerner, and I view both secession and intimidation in a negative light. If Mexico sent paramilitary units into the Gadsden Purchase, how would these same people react?
I'm sure there's a law against Happy Endings in Ontario.DoomYoshi wrote:Actually, continuing on the sex slavery idea... bringing it right back around. In my city, there are many massage parlors who have amazing profit margins mainly because they rely on girls who never went to school and have been forced to do this their entire lives. In bordering cities, the girls come from Asia, but Niagara Falls is strictly Russian mafia controlled. When I say it's a big problem, I mean it. We have 1 "massage parlor" per 4800 residents. Old hotels have been converted into mafia bases. Following the chain of command to the top, it always ends with the oligarchs. Russia declared war on me 10 years ago when they bought out all the strip clubs and parlours. Every day it directly ruins my neighborhood and my life.
I am sure to a lesser extent, the same is true of wherever you live.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
I would be happy with blowing up the garbage can (i.e. Putin, the oligarchs and anyone who disrespects freedom of media and human life).saxitoxin wrote:I'm sure there's a law against Happy Endings in Ontario.DoomYoshi wrote:Actually, continuing on the sex slavery idea... bringing it right back around. In my city, there are many massage parlors who have amazing profit margins mainly because they rely on girls who never went to school and have been forced to do this their entire lives. In bordering cities, the girls come from Asia, but Niagara Falls is strictly Russian mafia controlled. When I say it's a big problem, I mean it. We have 1 "massage parlor" per 4800 residents. Old hotels have been converted into mafia bases. Following the chain of command to the top, it always ends with the oligarchs. Russia declared war on me 10 years ago when they bought out all the strip clubs and parlours. Every day it directly ruins my neighborhood and my life.
I am sure to a lesser extent, the same is true of wherever you live.
You spent the last week eating at Taco Bell. You threw all the wrappers and half-eaten Loaded Potato Grillers on the floor, stinking up the place. Instead of just putting them in the garbage can you want to blow-up the Taco Bell?
This smacks of the same vein as the Domino Theory. Hell, I grew up hating Russia (I had a "Better Dead than Red" T-shirt) and that we were eventually going to fight a war with the commies.DoomYoshi wrote:For one thing, Russia and China are trying to have more clout in Africa. After billions of dollars and 40 or 50 years of support to some of these countries (even longer for Liberia), America can't be seen to be weakening, or else progress in the Middle East and Africa will halt.patches70 wrote: I don't see why the US should go mucking around in it, unless you have some further information that I might not know about.
This is a geopolitical war. Crimea doesn't matter to the United States. The entire world hangs in the balance here. A resplendent USSR, one that ignores completely international agreements (the Budapest memorandum) will be a problem.
How will Iran respond to nuclear talks after seeing how the US and Russia jointly shat all over that agreement? How will those talks go if all the parties meeting with Iran from Russia and US are sanctioned against each other.
Ok. So we should go back to cold war setting because Putin doesn't acknowledge the Crimean sex slave problem?Yoshi wrote:There is a true morality here. As Jimmy Carter said last night on Letterman, there are now more slaves in the world than at any time in the 19th century or earlier. Russia and China both base their economies on slavery. Regardless of all the stupid human rights (non-discrimination, freedom of speech and religion etc.), slavery is one that most can agree is despicable. And yet Putin hasn't even acknowledged the Crimean sex slave problem.
Still not sure how Putin can possibly be held responsible for law enforcement, garbage collection, bus service, the summer library reading club, etc., in Mississauga.DoomYoshi wrote:I would be happy with blowing up the garbage can (i.e. Putin, the oligarchs and anyone who disrespects freedom of media and human life).saxitoxin wrote:I'm sure there's a law against Happy Endings in Ontario.DoomYoshi wrote:Actually, continuing on the sex slavery idea... bringing it right back around. In my city, there are many massage parlors who have amazing profit margins mainly because they rely on girls who never went to school and have been forced to do this their entire lives. In bordering cities, the girls come from Asia, but Niagara Falls is strictly Russian mafia controlled. When I say it's a big problem, I mean it. We have 1 "massage parlor" per 4800 residents. Old hotels have been converted into mafia bases. Following the chain of command to the top, it always ends with the oligarchs. Russia declared war on me 10 years ago when they bought out all the strip clubs and parlours. Every day it directly ruins my neighborhood and my life.
I am sure to a lesser extent, the same is true of wherever you live.
You spent the last week eating at Taco Bell. You threw all the wrappers and half-eaten Loaded Potato Grillers on the floor, stinking up the place. Instead of just putting them in the garbage can you want to blow-up the Taco Bell?
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Must have been nice to grow up in the safety of North America instead of say, Vietnam or Czechoslovakia or dare I say, Crimea.patches70 wrote: This smacks of the same vein as the Domino Theory. Hell, I grew up hating Russia (I had a "Better Dead than Red" T-shirt) and that we were eventually going to fight a war with the commies.
But as I got older and started seeing things more clearly, I realized that it was all bullshit,
DoomYoshi wrote:Actually, continuing on the sex slavery idea... bringing it right back around. In my city, there are many massage parlors who have amazing profit margins mainly because they rely on girls who never went to school and have been forced to do this their entire lives. In bordering cities, the girls come from Asia, but Niagara Falls is strictly Russian mafia controlled. When I say it's a big problem, I mean it. We have 1 "massage parlor" per 4800 residents. Old hotels have been converted into mafia bases. Following the chain of command to the top, it always ends with the oligarchs. Russia declared war on me 10 years ago when they bought out all the strip clubs and parlours. Every day it directly ruins my neighborhood and my life.
I am sure to a lesser extent, the same is true of wherever you live.
It's like in Kenya where they say "how can we change anything when the problems just seep over the border from Somalia" and in Somalia they say "how can we change anything when the problems just seep over the border from Kenya" and so on and on down the whole of Africa. What you get is a bunch of desPOTS calling desKETTLES black. I get that.saxitoxin wrote:
Still not sure how Putin can possibly be held responsible for law enforcement, garbage collection, bus service, the summer library reading club, etc., in Mississauga.
Been illegal since 2005. Up until this year there was a total of 7 trials of human trafficking (in that same period 30k in the States), this year there was a blitz focused not on punitive measures but on actually freeing the women.patches70 wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Actually, continuing on the sex slavery idea... bringing it right back around. In my city, there are many massage parlors who have amazing profit margins mainly because they rely on girls who never went to school and have been forced to do this their entire lives. In bordering cities, the girls come from Asia, but Niagara Falls is strictly Russian mafia controlled. When I say it's a big problem, I mean it. We have 1 "massage parlor" per 4800 residents. Old hotels have been converted into mafia bases. Following the chain of command to the top, it always ends with the oligarchs. Russia declared war on me 10 years ago when they bought out all the strip clubs and parlours. Every day it directly ruins my neighborhood and my life.
I am sure to a lesser extent, the same is true of wherever you live.
So it's Putin's fault that Canada doesn't enforce Canadian law? Hmm, or are these mafia sex rings legal in Canada?
One Tomahawk missile cost $1.4 million. With benefits, pension, etc., you could hire 14 police for a year for the same price. You could have two full-time cops standing outside every single massage parlor in Canada for half the cost of going to war with Russia. Plus there would be a 99% decreased chance that Calgary would get turned into a pile of smoldering rubble by the Strategic Rocket Forces. Pimps don't usually have nukes.*DoomYoshi wrote:Been illegal since 2005. Up until this year there was a total of 7 trials of human trafficking (in that same period 30k in the States), this year there was a blitz focused not on punitive measures but on actually freeing the women.patches70 wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Actually, continuing on the sex slavery idea... bringing it right back around. In my city, there are many massage parlors who have amazing profit margins mainly because they rely on girls who never went to school and have been forced to do this their entire lives. In bordering cities, the girls come from Asia, but Niagara Falls is strictly Russian mafia controlled. When I say it's a big problem, I mean it. We have 1 "massage parlor" per 4800 residents. Old hotels have been converted into mafia bases. Following the chain of command to the top, it always ends with the oligarchs. Russia declared war on me 10 years ago when they bought out all the strip clubs and parlours. Every day it directly ruins my neighborhood and my life.
I am sure to a lesser extent, the same is true of wherever you live.
So it's Putin's fault that Canada doesn't enforce Canadian law? Hmm, or are these mafia sex rings legal in Canada?
It is a problem of Canada. It is also a problem of Russia. Why not fight it on both fronts? I am doing everything I can here... I want my army and my armies allies (hint, hint, US&A) to do what they can about it.
There you have it, rent-seeking Yoshi.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
You're saying that you'd be willing to have a (potentially thermonuclear) war with Russia over sex-slaves? I am not saying that isn't absolutely deplorable, and a major problem in the world today, but you'd want hundred of thousands of people to die for this?DoomYoshi wrote: Been illegal since 2005. Up until this year there was a total of 7 trials of human trafficking (in that same period 30k in the States), this year there was a blitz focused not on punitive measures but on actually freeing the women.
It is a problem of Canada. It is also a problem of Russia. Why not fight it on both fronts? I am doing everything I can here... I want my army and my armies allies (hint, hint, US&A) to do what they can about it.
There you have it, rent-seeking Yoshi.
Jmac1026 wrote:You're saying that you'd be willing to have a (potentially thermonuclear) war with Russia over sex-slaves? I am not saying that isn't absolutely deplorable, and a major problem in the world today, but you'd want hundred of thousands of people to die for this?DoomYoshi wrote: Been illegal since 2005. Up until this year there was a total of 7 trials of human trafficking (in that same period 30k in the States), this year there was a blitz focused not on punitive measures but on actually freeing the women.
It is a problem of Canada. It is also a problem of Russia. Why not fight it on both fronts? I am doing everything I can here... I want my army and my armies allies (hint, hint, US&A) to do what they can about it.
There you have it, rent-seeking Yoshi.
I find that difficult to believe.
Orson Welles wrote:In Italy for thirty years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love; they had five hundred years of democracy and peace and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock.
That's not an entirely terrible idea. Canada should have mandatory military service.Jmac1026 wrote:And let's not play pretend here. Your Canada would get invaded, that's unquestionable. The U.S. and Russia would both prefer to fight it out in Europe and Canada than in their own countries.
So, up until 9 years ago sex slavery was legal in Canada? And you are blaming Russia? Bwahahahaha!DoomYoshi wrote:
Been illegal since 2005.
Ha! My country is doing more to fight the problem than your country! Nyaa nyya na nyaaa yaaa.Yoshi wrote: Up until this year there was a total of 7 trials of human trafficking (in that same period 30k in the States), this year there was a blitz focused not on punitive measures but on actually freeing the women.
So, you claim your hatred of the Russian leaders and then also want their help? hmmmm.....You know, you'll catch more bees with honey than with shit.yoshi wrote:It is a problem of Canada. It is also a problem of Russia. Why not fight it on both fronts?
yoshi wrote: I am doing everything I can here...
f*ck you! I tell you what Yoshi, you join the military and go fight the good fight then if that's how you feel. But damn you to hell telling other people to go fight and die for your cause!yoshi wrote:I want my army and my armies allies (hint, hint, US&A) to do what they can about it.
I would say that Fifteen to twenty percent of Americans can't point to America on the map.thegreekdog wrote:You give us way too much credit. Fifteen to twenty percent of Americans couldn't point to Ukraine on a map.

I disagree; if Mexico occupied the Gadsden Purchase it wouldn't affect you anymore than Russia occupying Ukraine.thegreekdog wrote:I'd be pissed. But last I checked, I have a pretty clear vested interest in the non-invasion of the Gadsden Purchase. I don't have the same vested interest in making sure Ukraine isn't part of Russia (at least not enough of a vested interest to pound the table and demand that my country does something about it).Juan_Bottom wrote:I'm an American, and a Northerner, and I view both secession and intimidation in a negative light. If Mexico sent paramilitary units into the Gadsden Purchase, how would these same people react?
This is what I'm talking about. I do not understand this rise of Putin-worship that has happened, especially in America. I'm sure that for many rednecks, they love Putin as the anti-hero, the anti-Obama hero, but is that really enough to explain away the positive reception that Putin gets in media? His country has a 99% conviction rate, an insanely high corruption rate, and just flooded Crimea with paramilitary units. Putin has been executing and imprisoning political enemies for years, including reporters. Putin's paramilitary in Crimea were detaining reporters and destroying their photographs and memory cards - that's how well they behave when the whole world is watching them. It's not a good place to live. Russia is 100X the police state that the United States is. So what is up with all the love?This may all be true, but two wrongs don't make a right.saxitoxin wrote:Everyone wants to live in Fantasyland Utopia, no one wants to live in a Dystopian Wasteland. It's understandable if some of them are too frightened to be able to confront their circumstances and effect change from within. Those ones will cover their eyes in the flag and loyally regurgitate the slogans being repeated by their regimes. The west is essentially a sprawling, right-wing, fascist mega-state.
The fact that the U.S. has degenerated into a sadistic fascist police state does not mean that Russia has not.
The fact that BATF agents are able to literally get away with murder under the the guise of the War on Drugs, and that the the NSA plays Big Brother under the guise of the whimsically-titled "War on Terror" does not change the fact that former KGB agents in Russia enjoy the same immunity to the rule of law.
Calling Putin a hero because he's helping to embarrass Obama is like calling Stalin a nice guy because he helped defeat Hitler. One wicked tyrant scoring points at the expense of another is not an exercise in moral ascendancy.
It's not really that different. The Gadsden Purchase has a history of being Mexican property and is full of Mexican Americans.t-o-m wrote:Apologies if you took my post as an insult. It was in jest. The way you phrased it (is that the correct phrase? can you 'phrase' images?) was in a humorous way, too. If you actually cared about the comparison with history – Hitler > Sudetenland with Putin > Crimea, then I don't think you would have included the hosting of the Olympics.
That's a complete, inconsequential and irrelevant coincidence – but a funny one at that!
p.s. It is also a very different comparison with US/Mexico. You're right – people would be terribly upset. But that's a world away from what we're discussing.
Short answer - no.patches70 wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Okay, but that's still in the invader's best interest, right?BigBallinStalin wrote:@ patches, sure, if one ascribes to realism. If one prefers "international liberalism" (i.e. invade countries to spread democracy and/or stop violence with violence), then one can insert as many moral claims as they see fit.
I'm 100% all in on patches70's theory. If the United States can demonstrate to me that it's in the country's best interest (and, more importantly my best interest) to do X, then I am in favor of said action (morality aside).
So, TGD, has the US, Obama, Kerry and the rest made the case to your satisfaction that it's important enough for us to intervene, that it's in your best interests? And more importantly, that it's in our nation's best interest?
For my part there has been zero reason provided for why it's worth it for the US to take such a line, especially considering consequences for said actions which would be/are inevitable.
I just can't see any upside to losing Russia just to gain the Ukraine. That's a horrible trade off. And pushing Russia and China closer together is absolutely horrible. One of our saving graces was that Russia and China pretty much hated each other. I prefer it like that. Now that I can view as in national interests, keeping those two from getting too chummy with each other. As it's going now, it's not going so well and it all could have been avoided by just keeping our noses out of Ukraine's business.
I swear these world leaders act like spoiled children that absolutely cannot allow anyone else to throw egg on their face even if said world leaders threw said egg on their own face.
So many questions.BigBallinStalin wrote:No, not necessarily. It depends on how the state's interests coincide with each major policymaker view of the "state's" interests. For example, most realists were against the Iraq War 2.0 invasion, but a small group of neocons got their way with their international liberal agenda. The "state" then invades Iraq because that was within the "state's" interests.thegreekdog wrote:Okay, but that's still in the invader's best interest, right?BigBallinStalin wrote:@ patches, sure, if one ascribes to realism. If one prefers "international liberalism" (i.e. invade countries to spread democracy and/or stop violence with violence), then one can insert as many moral claims as they see fit.
I'm 100% all in on patches70's theory. If the United States can demonstrate to me that it's in the country's best interest (and, more importantly my best interest) to do X, then I am in favor of said action (morality aside).
National interest varies in degrees too. There's 4 categories for state's interests: Vital, Important, Peripheral, and No Interest. Realists would put invading Crimea at Peripheral or Zero. International liberals would put it at Vital or Important.
I like the realist aspect of patches' points, but realism does have a normative guideline: maximize state security. Having a normative guideline is unavoidable but having a complementary, moral guideline is necessary; otherwise, you could find plenty of reasons to beat up or threaten other people.
For example, suppose the US could maximize GDP by an additional 10% per year by killing 25% of the poor people and 25% of the very old people. Poverty falls drastically (cuz some of them die), but also because growth of 10% per year is insanely awesome. We'd all be ballers within a generation.
How would you know that such a policy is in the country's best interests without relying on any moral guideline?
Yeah, I think most of us (e.g. BBS, patches, me) understand that. And that's ultimately kind of my point. If it's in my (thegreekdog's) best interest for Apple to sell more product in Country X and the only way for Apple to do that is for the United States to prop up a despot / invade / bomb / spy / sanction, then I'm in favor of it (again, ignoring morality, cost to me in present and future taxes, and the drop in United States influence).saxitoxin wrote:The mistake is in being sucked into the false choice that western leaders are either correctly pursuing state interests or incorrectly pursuing state interests.
Normal IR theories - defensive realism, offensive realism, feminist constructivism, liberalism, Marxism, etc. - don't apply here because state interests are not at play. These are personal interests, the opportunity to grow new markets and, with them, new power. The resulting spoils are being used to line individual bank accounts. When the U.S. loots a country it doesn't divvy up the booty between American citizens. The U.S. government is the personal commercial enterprise of the people running it. They have an interest assigning a portion of the treasure to various vassals (the Republicans to big business, the Democrats to social interest groups), but that's the cost of doing business, like paying your employees. It's not what Inghram and Schneider meant when they discussed pluralist policymaking.
Once one rejects this 5th grade civics way of looking at the world - capitalism, communism, etc. - and realizes the U.S. is neither capitalist nor communist, but is in fact a feudal nation, a landstaat run for the benefit of the MEP chiefs, the inconsistencies of state actions resolve themselves.
it would affect me more, but you're right, I still probably wouldn't care enough to go to war if Tuscon was part of Mexico.Juan_Bottom wrote:I disagree; if Mexico occupied the Gadsden Purchase it wouldn't affect you anymore than Russia occupying Ukraine.