Moderator: Community Team
As far as I know. (I was not informed of losing it again today.) Vote Strike Wolf As the requested test.strike wolf wrote:Ebwop: Oh and spiesr, do you have your vote back? Can you vote someone other than Jak as a test please?
There was a time when I agreed with you. I started a thread once (not on this board) debating whether or not vigs who shoot N1 should be modkilled for playing against victory conditions. Over time my thinking changed. Let me say that there a heck of a ton of good and great players who say that a vig who doesn't shoot N1 is anti-town. I also agree with that. A vig is like a cop, except the results aren't debatable. After watcher, it's the most powerful standard ability. Mafia is 100% end-game. Eventually, we will be down to a few players. Nothing matters until that point. The vig helps keep control of that point in town hands and not in scum.Jmac1026 wrote:You shot on night 1, a vig tactic that's universally despised, especially since there are three other actions that could have helped town.
Kinda WIFOM-y, but I don't know why anyone would waste the clock on the first day/night period if it were only 1-shot. I could imagine a good way to balance it would be that it had a recharge period, i.e. use D1, recharges D2, etc. Makes things a little more balanced, although still seems like it would be a way overpowered ability. Not that this game has any real guarantee of balance.Nebuchadnezer wrote:I like Strike Wolf's theories on the Clock. I think we wait to see if the Clock strikes again or not. It may have been a 1-shot ability.
Army of GOD wrote:I should stop posting...
You want me dead, why bother saying other than Jak? I could say who I believe the next in line is the next scummiest, but as you and others have pointed out, this is no longer a to hunt scum day, this is just a "lynch the guy who was wrong" day. That in its self speaks major vibes of what some alignments are.strike wolf wrote:Ebwop: Oh and spiesr, do you have your vote back? Can you vote someone other than Jak as a test please?
Let's consider the pot.. stirred.Well, I'm in the game, so the pot shall be stirred one way or another..
Get over yourself, bud. If you're genuine, then people are voting you because you're dropping some serious scum vibes. Also, your theories are shit because you have no filter. Making crazy theories doesn't really help much. It might go better if you operate on information you can actually derive into usable information.jak wrote:Literally, if town wants my help, show it. They wonder why I'm coming off as anti-town it's because no one is here trying to help out at all. I've claimed and am expected to report to you, but if I'm honest I'm yet again attacked.
That's why I'm more of a not going to bend over for anyone attitude this game. I'm sick of all my theories being called shit just because they're a bit out there sometimes. It's better than doing nothing all day like I could copy some of you and lay low with small inputs here and there with nothing trying to add value.
I am afraid that isn't how this works. You did thing X and we know about it, now everyone will use that thing towards judging if you are town or not. You can't tell them not to. You can only try to explain things in such manner as to guide them in the direction you want. (Which you have/are attempting.)jak111 wrote:I killed Zivel, get over it.
Not sharing that information would have not been a very town friendly thing to do more often than not. Accordingly the expectations placed on you almost demand that you told us that if you want people to think you are town.jak111 wrote:But lets not even bother kidding each other, I could of stayed silent if I was anti-town letting you believe Mafia killed him with only I and them knowing it not true. Instead I outed the information that Mafia did NOT make a kill last night.
That is the conclusion that most of us find probable at this point, but it definitely isn't a sure thing yet.jak111 wrote:It's not because a protective role, they were suppose to have another whole day to send in actions and didn't get the time.
I believe you should be the lynch at the end of the day. This does not exclude other discussion at this point I am actually an advocate of lynching you but not going too quick about it because I want to talk about others today as well. For one thing, I was hoping someone would rejuvenate the Nark case to see if I understood it better if it was put together more in one post but so far that hasn't happened.jak111 wrote:You want me dead, why bother saying other than Jak? I could say who I believe the next in line is the next scummiest, but as you and others have pointed out, this is no longer a to hunt scum day, this is just a "lynch the guy who was wrong" day. That in its self speaks major vibes of what some alignments are.strike wolf wrote:Ebwop: Oh and spiesr, do you have your vote back? Can you vote someone other than Jak as a test please?
I would go as far as to say that an unused vig kill is better than a vig kill that was mostly random.Two of my roles are better saved for N3/N4 with my other role more for N2 if we get some information to go on D2. But as I am going to die, they are useless. I used the kill because it was the ONLY role I have that would give us results for Night 1. As I figure, I'm already outed D1, Chances are I am not going to live until D5, so I am going to use my most productive roles first. I used my kill role on a guy I believed to be scummy. Keeping the other 3 roles to choose from when we have more information.
You are misquoting Spiesr horribly. What he said was that it was better to question comments early by experienced players than try to make one late game.Someone even said it yesterday when I was defending Rodion that to kill people early on when you think they're scummy is better than trying to build up a case later. It's a for sure check that's either right or wrong. No WIFOM and no lying to protect it.
Sorry but you are the only one on your high horse. What the other people have said is only to try to get you to listen to others. Other than that. This has nothing to do with your PR. Your Avatar JOAT claim yesterday was what got me to hesitate voting you back then. So please don't put words in my mouth.If you have a problem with me being an OUTED PR (which was NOT my choice) and doing what I believed right, say so. Don't hide being me being "anti-town". Claiming I'm on a high-horse when people are claiming to be superior that THEY would never make a bad kill if they had a killing power (I know not the exact wording, but close enough).
I will not get over it and the logic here is why. You are unapologetic. Every intent seems to be that you will make similar moves in the future when given the chance. These are moves that hurt town more often than not in games. YOU DO NOT LISTEN TO OTHERS AT ALL! That is why I cannot let this go. Why I cannot just "get over it".I killed Zivel, get over it. This is Mafia, I did what I thought would be a good move to kill a scummy player early on. I did not know his role neither did anyone else. Killing him was as good as any other kill I could of done last night.
The difference is that if I protected someone, I didn't kill them. If I investigated someone. I didn't kill them. If I role blocked someone. I didn't kill them. If I busdrove someone, I didn't kill them. If I chose any non-vig action that could have been on my table. I didn't kill them. Dead townies don't help town.If all claims and actions were on the table, I could ask many of you why you did whatever you did to someone last night and why it was them. The only difference between my action and yours is mine gave results. As of right now, my role is the only one that gave results to the entire town, everyone else have results but only known to them and not helping town in any way shape or form right now.
If you want me dead, place down the vote, show your real colours. At this point half the votes are admitting they already believe me to be town. But hey, let's just kill me anyway. That's sure to help town in the long run. I've even said that was my only killer power, so the rest are more beneficial for like I said, when we know more information.
But lets not even bother kidding each other, I could of stayed silent if I was anti-town letting you believe Mafia killed him with only I and them knowing it not true. Instead I outed the information that Mafia did NOT make a kill last night. It's not because a protective role, they were suppose to have another whole day to send in actions and didn't get the time.
Finally, my last bit of thing for tonight, some of you are saying "Yeah, lets look into someone else" Time is ticking away like that clock. It's one thing to say you will do something, it's another thing to actually do it.
FP'd Four times.
@ Doom, I know.
Let's consider the pot.. stirred.Well, I'm in the game, so the pot shall be stirred one way or another..
I personally find that the entire case is a load of BS that just might have some scum hiding in its midst egging on more reactions. It's just creating a big wagon that is not for the town's benefit, unfortunally there's actual townies trying to pitch in that actually don't care any longer because they are on a little high horse trying to sound all mighty that they'd be right if they were in my shoes.
@ Jmac, "If he's actually town" listen to what others are saying, they're saying up front I'm town. But I'm an "easy lynch" so to speak with REAL town hopping on board. You make it sound like I took a potshot at 20 different targets. No, I eliminated some people form killing last night and had about a list of 6 different candidates with Zivel's constant pushing for a 2nd death D1 just a bit too non-townie for my liking. I took a shot at a read I felt was good, it was wrong. Not every kill or action PR's are going to do is right or else we'd have a tracker watcher AND cop all outing 3 different scum since they just so happen to PERFECTLY hit every single night. We probably have a regular vig already, I doubt I had the only town kill action in the game. I used up one of my 4 actions, trying to use them all before I die.
Just be glad I admitted to killing him and be glad I didn't waste any protection roles last night.
FP'd by DoomYoshi, really? You think I'm taking this personally just because I'm getting heated up about the BS case on me? You and I BOTH know there's mafia on it and what I did had its own justification. Now it might be a mix of town and scum hopping on board because "Hey, let's kill the guy that other townies are making into an easy lynch and cast the blame on him completely for it". Not one has said I am justified enough to make a choice with my night actions as I believe right.
It saddens me that people think I should have no right to an opinion on how to use my night actions at night with what I have for night actions.
Also Tail's activity has been up, just very small posts.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
The clock guy, has just screwed mafia over and you want him to come out. Anybody else having a hard time processing that?jak111 wrote:If anyone should be explaining things, it should be this clock guy. It's not mafia role as Mafia definitely failed last night. So it's either a premature town role or a third party role.
Sometimes, if it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck and smells like a duck, we actually have to assume it might be a duck. WIFOM'ing away every strong case doesn't help either.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Hmm, I don't believe I'll be participating in the jak lynch. Just something about it that got some serious funk about it. We have a guy who ruffles some feathers D1, claims without any real pressure, and now conveniently fesses up to killing Zivel while dropping some hilariously bad hypocritical posts and scum tells?
It's a little too neat for me and reeks of a ploy.
-Tails
Apparently he did not want to claim, but two people asking for a claim and five people stating they do not really believe in the case was enough? Read back and see.If you have a problem with me being an OUTED PR (which was NOT my choice) and doing what I believed right, say so.

aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
No, no it isn't. IB that's my horse.Iron Butterfly wrote: Jonty thats my horse.
Alright Spiesr has a vote. That officially clears Spiesr's lost vote being a prerequisite for the horse game. As of right now, Spiesr appears town in my eyes.strike wolf wrote:
1. Strike->KGB (Just posted today and has been active)
2. Anarkist>Aage
3. IB->Whatsausage
4. Aage>Lootifer
5. Lootifer>Spiesr
6. Rodion>Edoc
7. Doomyoshi>Betiko
8. Spiesr>TFO MudPuppy
9. Jak>Tails
10. Hotshot>Strike
11. Jmac>Anarkist
12. Whatsausage->Sheep
13. Jonty->Doomyoshi
14. Tails>Hotshot
15. Neb>Jak
16. KGB->IB
17. Edoc>Neb
18. Sheep->Jonty125
19. Betiko>Jmac
20. Mudpupp>Rodion
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.

I don't like this post. You are not clearly understanding why jak should be lynched. He is saying that killing a person based on one day's actions and posts was better than waiting a day. Yet when we apply that thinking to his actions, we are all stupid for doing so. He has set a double standard. He can kill on a whim while nobody can judge him even though the evidence is more damming.HotShot53 wrote:After reading all the discussions today... I actually get a more townish vibe on jak today than I did yesterday. Him admitting to killing zivel, although obviously a mistake, and I disagree with the reasons for it, seem to show he's trying to give us info such as the mafia took too long and didn't get their kill in (most likely). I don't think he'd admit to killing zivel if he actually was scum.
I disagree with policy lynching people you think are probably town just because you don't like their attitude. I know jak (and often nark) can get annoying... but that alone isn't a reason to lynch them.
Yes, it does. Imagine you were scum and just claimed JOAT. You haven't said anything about your abilities except that there are four. The next night, your mafia team kills one of the other players (perhaps even on Jak's urgings - it wouldn't strike me as strange if Jak would immediately try to take the upper hand in a 48-hour night with some people breathing down his neck) which gives you an excellent opportunity to claim that you used 'the only ability that would yield result'. Or, to put it differently: it is the only action that the town knows to have transpired, since pcm posted the death scene with absolutely no indication as to the intentions of Zivel's killer(s).kgb007 wrote:It make no sense for him to claim the zivel kill if he were scum.
I am going to go out on a limb here and say that the only way Jak would be 3rd party is if he is lying about being a JOAT. (Or perhaps really stretching the term.) For all pancakemix says about alignment being random there is a pattern to what ends up as 3rd party in these games. The 3rd party roles have all been ones where the alignment grows out of the role rather than being randomly assigned afterwords.Nebuchadnezer wrote:[The fact that hotshot claims we are killing a maybe town role just because he's annoying is very suspicious and misleading...especially when jak is not acting completely town. Is he mafia? Probably not. 3rd party? Most likely. Sk? Definitely possible. Town? Might be.
I am fairly confident that this isn't an intentional ploy on Jak's part.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Hmm, I don't believe I'll be participating in the jak lynch. Just something about it that got some serious funk about it. We have a guy who ruffles some feathers D1, claims without any real pressure, and now conveniently fesses up to killing Zivel while dropping some hilariously bad hypocritical posts and scum tells?
It's a little too neat for me and reeks of a ploy.