djt5483 wrote:i wish i even had the time to play 100 games lol
its not that tough
you log on and you have like 10 games to move in. 6 hours later you have another 10. when you have to wait 24 hours for 6 people it takes awhile.
ACtually it's different for me, the reason why for a while I went down to 4.
USually I get 20 of my 30 games when I get home, then I barely have any turns which is a bit annoying.
i usually stay around 50 and when i get home from work i usually have my turns in atleast half of them. but i have dial up connection which slows me down ALOT
I think the reason it isn't breaking the terms of the membership is that you can play as many games as you want. If Johnnyrocket's games filled up the moment he created them he could create sets of 50 over and over again for hours, and end up with thousands of games.
JoeCorden wrote:he could create sets of 50 over and over again for hours, and end up with thousands of games.
And whats the problem with that??????
I just wish i had the time to play as many as Johnny does.
Wife, Kids and a demanding job only make in possible for 20-30 max
I'm not saying there is any problem, its just that people were saying capping the number of games that you can create breaks the terms of the membership. I was offering an idea as to why that might not be the case.
Not once in that post did I say that I had a problem with lots of games being created, so I don't know where you got the idea from.
yeti_c wrote:Hasn't there only been 1 occurence of this problem... Ever?
C.
2 I think. I joined one of the 15 million games one guy made figuring that if he was going to play my favourite map with my favourite settings (Middle Earth, esc, standard, seq, unlimited) and deadbeat, that's easy points for me!
I honestly cant see what the problem is as the minute a game is filled you can create another one. Of course if the games dont fill up there is a problem but it is the same problem that you would have if you set up 500
comic boy wrote:I honestly cant see what the problem is as the minute a game is filled you can create another one. Of course if the games dont fill up there is a problem but it is the same problem that you would have if you set up 500
1)I have 3 doubles players to set 10 games up with and I cant
2) I was asked to join a RT game and I cant
3) when the battle royal is set up I cant join
I am just sitting here waiting for players to join the games
JR's Game Profile
[spoiler]Highest Score- 3969 Highest Place- 1st Highest Rank- Conqueror Total Medals Won- 157 6 time Wac-a-Mod Champion June 2014 Monthly Challenge Winner August 2020 Monthly Challenge Winner[/spoiler]
poo-maker wrote::roll: There should be a way to apply for exceptions to the rule...
this is what I sent to Lack in my request. If he wants to make the rule into affect for new recuits thats fine, but I feel im being pentalized for others actions. Im coming up on 3,100 games and I only ever missed 2 turns. 1 was by 2 mins.
JR's Game Profile
[spoiler]Highest Score- 3969 Highest Place- 1st Highest Rank- Conqueror Total Medals Won- 157 6 time Wac-a-Mod Champion June 2014 Monthly Challenge Winner August 2020 Monthly Challenge Winner[/spoiler]
steve monkey wrote:
All games are 6 player, sequential, escalating, adjacent
461710 - Cairns Coral Coast
461712 - Great Lakes
461714 - Middle East
461715 - 8 Thoughts
461716 - King Of The Mountains
461717 - Space
461718 - US Senate
Password for all games is XXXXXX-edited for protection
Hope you can join.
Steve
I CANT. WE ARE NOW PERMITTED ONLY TO HAVE 50 GAMES IN THE "GAME WAITING" SECTION. THANKS FOR THE INVITE THOUGH
JR's Game Profile
[spoiler]Highest Score- 3969 Highest Place- 1st Highest Rank- Conqueror Total Medals Won- 157 6 time Wac-a-Mod Champion June 2014 Monthly Challenge Winner August 2020 Monthly Challenge Winner[/spoiler]
JR, you can drop some of those 50 waiting games you have. I mean really... if you have say 20 games set up with same other two people, what's the harm in dropping some of those for now?
I do see JR's point and agree he should be given an exception, if possible. I realize it's a bad precedent to set, but perhaps a rule could be made that after 3000 finished games (or some other ridiculous number) the restriction is lifted. Every game he has started already has at least 2 other people joined. Him dropping the game affects more than just him, and I'm sure he's trying to be polite about it.
wicked wrote:JR, you can drop some of those 50 waiting games you have. I mean really... if you have say 20 games set up with same other two people, what's the harm in dropping some of those for now?
because I want 300 active games. I only have 100. so only having 50 in game waiting is preventing me from reaching 300. players joining my games and games being completed move at the same pace.
JR's Game Profile
[spoiler]Highest Score- 3969 Highest Place- 1st Highest Rank- Conqueror Total Medals Won- 157 6 time Wac-a-Mod Champion June 2014 Monthly Challenge Winner August 2020 Monthly Challenge Winner[/spoiler]
They are saying that one can only have 50 games that are waiting for players at a time.
Johnny, if you want to get up to 300 games just find a partner and join one of the many doubles games that are waiting for 2 players. They will start right away so you can join more without waiting.