Charity breast fondling thread

[DaGip]

I'm pretty sure that's Sister Feng

Not very popular in the United States I am afraid.



However, I found her plastic surgery photos quite humorous:

[mrswdk]

Not exactly 'popular' in China either

Oh well, she's been exported to New York so she's your problem now!

[tzor]

The best thing to come out of China is the cup of tea I just had. The tea was from Kenya by the way.

We have a whole bag of candy that the person visiting my work place from Quality Assurance brought with him. They are pretty tasty.

[mrswdk]

So what was wrong with the thread?

[WILLIAMS5232]

So what was wrong with the thread?

they probably were hoping you forgot about it. anyway, this part of the website is pretty much for the moderators amusement so i wouldnt expect a legitimate response. probably juat something along the lines of "blah blah blah, you hurt my feelings"

[mrswdk]

reserved

[tzor]

Has this thread gotten so popular you need reservations now?

[DaGip]

Give me $2.00 for posting this.

[mrswdk]

Has this thread gotten so popular you need reservations now?

Clearly

[mrswdk]

What's up with the silence? Is this site moderated by the CPC, and I'm going to get tragically killed in a hit and run if I keep asking where my thread has vanished to?

[AndyDufresne]

What's up with the silence? Is this site moderated by the CPC, and I'm going to get tragically killed in a hit and run if I keep asking where my thread has vanished to?

I think it is time to turn the OT into HK.


--Andy

[notyou2]

Shouldn't that pic be in the Oriental Girls thread?


OWEN!!!! We need your opinion.

[mrswdk]

Why was my charity breasts thread completely deleted?

[DaGip]

Has this thread gotten so popular you need reservations now?

Clearly

I think those are indeed Japanese sex slaves!

And this is how they catch them!

[notyou2]

Has this thread gotten so popular you need reservations now?

Clearly

I think those are indeed Japanese sex slaves!

And this is how they catch them!

The right one is delectable.

[mrswdk]

The bear's t-shirt says 上海话, which means something along the lines of 'Shanghai slang'.

Mods, where is the fcking breasts thread?

[Dukasaur]

He already answered you on Sept. 7th. Do you think he should repeat the answer 20 times just because you repeat the question 20 times?

[AndyDufresne]

The bear's t-shirt says 上海话, which means something along the lines of 'Shanghai slang'.

Mods, where is the fcking breasts thread?

I think it is time to start clogging up the forums and games with protest bodies and barricades!?!


--Andy

[notyou2]

It is a bit of a cloudy area. The thread had been reported (more than once).
I relocated it for the admins to decide, if there is nothing in it, then they can bring it back.

In all fairness to the original poster, the question was only partially answered. Duk are your reading comprehension skills deteriorating or are you just not happy anymore? You seem to be taking everything personally.

[Dukasaur]

It is a bit of a cloudy area. The thread had been reported (more than once).
I relocated it for the admins to decide, if there is nothing in it, then they can bring it back.

In all fairness to the original poster, the question was only partially answered. Duk are your reading comprehension skills deteriorating or are you just not happy anymore? You seem to be taking everything personally.

Okay, maybe he didn't elaborate to any great degree, but all the information is there.

The thread was reported by multiple users, so TeeGee had to review it. It was very much on the border of porn vs. not-porn, so he decided not to make any groundbreaking precedents and to refer the matter to the admins. Consequently, he moved the thread to a hidden forum where the admins keep such things.

If and when the admins decide it is harmless, they will move it back. So, either (possibly) they have decided it bad enough that it should remain under wraps, or (more likely) they have been busy with other things and haven't looked at it yet.

The admins are like the Supreme Court. Just because we send them a case for disposition doesn't mean they are obligated to answer. If something is important they usually will, but someone's desire to push the envelope and broaden the amount of soft-core porn in OT doesn't really qualify as an earth-shaking emergency.

[AndyDufresne]

someone's desire to push the envelope and broaden the amount of soft-core porn in OT doesn't really qualify as an earth-shaking emergency.

IF THAT AIN'T, I DUNT KNO WAT IS ANYMOAR


--Andy

[mrswdk]

Just because we send them a case for disposition doesn't mean they are obligated to answer.

That's the spirit.

[WILLIAMS5232]

Just because we send them a case for disposition doesn't mean they are obligated to answer.

That's the spirit.

hmm. interesting.

If something is important they usually will, but someone's desire to push the envelope and broaden the amount of soft-core porn in OT doesn't really qualify as an earth-shaking emergency.

so move it without a definitive explanation, then laugh about it behind closed doors while the supreme court "gets to it". classy.

the nudity was fuzzed out. how is that soft porn? you see worse on public television. what a bunch of bitches around here.

[Dukasaur]

the nudity was fuzzed out. how is that soft porn? you see worse on public television.

I honestly can't say. I remember the case only because it racked up about three reports in four hours, which is probably something of a record for Most Reported Non-Saxitoxic Thread. I honestly don't remember the details of what was in the thread.

Nor, for that matter, do I care. I was just being nice and answering notyou2's call for clarification. I don't have a horse in this race, and certainly don't deserve this kind of abuse for trying to help:

what a bunch of bitches around here.

The bitches have a job to be vigilant. A lot of our members play from work or from school, and a lot of the networks they play on use third-party content rating agencies to block domains in a variety of categories, including porn. If even one third-party content rating agency was to tag us for porn, we could be blocked from tens of thousands of networks, and have hundreds or even thousands of users permanently cut off from their games.

You have to put it in perspective. CC exists to provide war games. The bullshit that goes on in the forums, while it may seem important to the zero point two percent of members who participate in it, is ultimately very irrelevant to the 99.8% of the members who come here to play war games. The activities of the 0.2% can't be allowed to jeopardize the activities of the 99.8%, and if being a little overcautious in rooting out porn is the price of defending the war games, I'm all for it.

I like titties as much as any other heterosexual guy, but if I want to see some, there are plenty of websites devoted to that pursuit. Endangering the bread-and-butter of my favourite wargaming site is not an option.

[WILLIAMS5232]

the nudity was fuzzed out. how is that soft porn? you see worse on public television.

I honestly can't say. I remember the case only because it racked up about three reports in four hours, which is probably something of a record for Most Reported Non-Saxitoxic Thread. I honestly don't remember the details of what was in the thread.

Nor, for that matter, do I care. I was just being nice and answering notyou2's call for clarification. I don't have a horse in this race, and certainly don't deserve this kind of abuse for trying to help:

what a bunch of bitches around here.

The bitches have a job to be vigilant. A lot of our members play from work or from school, and a lot of the networks they play on use third-party content rating agencies to block domains in a variety of categories, including porn. If even one third-party content rating agency was to tag us for porn, we could be blocked from tens of thousands of networks, and have hundreds or even thousands of users permanently cut off from their games.

You have to put it in perspective. CC exists to provide war games. The bullshit that goes on in the forums, while it may seem important to the zero point two percent of members who participate in it, is ultimately very irrelevant to the 99.8% of the members who come here to play war games. The activities of the 0.2% can't be allowed to jeopardize the activities of the 99.8%, and if being a little overcautious in rooting out porn is the price of defending the war games, I'm all for it.

I like titties as much as any other heterosexual guy, but if I want to see some, there are plenty of websites devoted to that pursuit. Endangering the bread-and-butter of my favourite wargaming site is not an option.

ok, but it wasn't porn. it was a news article.
there was no nudity. i remember it.
i, like you, don't have a dog in the fight. nor do i care about the outcome of this. but i think some people are lame here. and it's that lameness that bugs me to no end. it would appear to me that there are about 3 members here that don't like the poster. that's a guess. and those three members are buddies with someone with the ability to move threads to hidden areas that "wait" for approval. i think that's more childish than putting a thread with fuzzed out nudity in the forums. i guess i could be wrong. but i don't think i am. mainly because i remember the picture in question. and there was nothing offensive unless you don't like heavily pixelated pictures.