Moderator: Community Team
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.

Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
No because I don't have it.jgordon1111 wrote:At least I can now understand why you support Gary Johnson.
Do you believe that all soldiers who have been in a combat zone have ptsd?
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Not that it matters to anyone but me, my estimate of you went up.DirtyDishSoap wrote:No because I don't have it.jgordon1111 wrote:At least I can now understand why you support Gary Johnson.
Do you believe that all soldiers who have been in a combat zone have ptsd?
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.

Duk humans are addictive by nature in almost everything they doDukasaur wrote:I'm not sure what the question is.
Yes, weed is probably less harmful than most prescription antidepressants and definitely less harmful than alcohol. Still, it is a drug dependency. One has to be honest about that. There is all that stuff about how weed doesn't create physical addiction, but if one can't deal with pain or anxiety without a particular drug, he is drug-dependent. As long as he's okay with that and not stuck in denial, I don't see a problem. Nobody needs to live with chronic pain or chronic depression if relief is possible.
Cue warmonger.jgordon1111 wrote:But back to the topic, George Washington grew weed
But like everything thing else its about money and the governments ability to control it.
Fair and likely true. Why buy that crappy yellow plastic rope if you can get much stronger hemp rope? Likely the reason George grew, rather than for recreation. Then again I never had a chance to hang out with him, maybe he was high every Friday.jgordon1111 wrote:But back to the topic, George Washington grew weed
But like everything thing else its about money and the governments ability to control it.
People are only addictive if they are hot or funny.jgordon1111 wrote:Duk humans are addictive by nature in almost everything they doDukasaur wrote:I'm not sure what the question is.
Yes, weed is probably less harmful than most prescription antidepressants and definitely less harmful than alcohol. Still, it is a drug dependency. One has to be honest about that. There is all that stuff about how weed doesn't create physical addiction, but if one can't deal with pain or anxiety without a particular drug, he is drug-dependent. As long as he's okay with that and not stuck in denial, I don't see a problem. Nobody needs to live with chronic pain or chronic depression if relief is possible.
But back to the topic, George Washington grew weed
But like everything thing else its about money and the governments ability to control it.
The question of medical marijuana is an interesting one. Under certain circumstances it is better than the alternatives. Let's talk about the REAL WORLD here, that is true for every known medical drug known to man. New York has a "medical marijuana" Program ( About the Medical Marijuana Program ). So we are discussing tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content and cannabidiol (CBD). The jury is out on the complete effects of these drugs on very critical conditions, but when we are talking about very critical conditions where the alternatives appear to be worse, I would always err on the side of the patient, assuming that it was told these events to the not 100% verified and that the patient assumes the responsibility of using such "experimental" medicines and procedures.DirtyDishSoap wrote:So recent publication for this, short article but he's a buddy of mine that was hit on patrol.
I know some folks out there are still all about the "But it's druuuuuuugs it's bad for you! YA NEED JESUS!" But yar.
Discuss!

Addictions take many forms, but perhaps a better term here is reliance. If you rely on a drug to get you through a day, there's a reliance in effect.Dukasaur wrote:I'm not sure what the question is.
Yes, weed is probably less harmful than most prescription antidepressants and definitely less harmful than alcohol. Still, it is a drug dependency. One has to be honest about that. There is all that stuff about how weed doesn't create physical addiction, but if one can't deal with pain or anxiety without a particular drug, he is drug-dependent. As long as he's okay with that and not stuck in denial, I don't see a problem. Nobody needs to live with chronic pain or chronic depression if relief is possible.
Aspirin is still a good idea for people with heart conditions. Indeed, getting someone who's having a heart attack to chew on aspirin is basic first aid.tzor wrote:The question of medical marijuana is an interesting one. Under certain circumstances it is better than the alternatives. Let's talk about the REAL WORLD here, that is true for every known medical drug known to man. New York has a "medical marijuana" Program ([url]https://www.health.ny.gov/regulations/medical_marijuana/about.htm]About the Medical Marijuana Program[/url]). So we are discussing tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content and cannabidiol (CBD). The jury is out on the complete effects of these drugs on very critical conditions, but when we are talking about very critical conditions where the alternatives appear to be worse, I would always err on the side of the patient, assuming that it was told these events to the not 100% verified and that the patient assumes the responsibility of using such "experimental" medicines and procedures.DirtyDishSoap wrote:So recent publication for this, short article but he's a buddy of mine that was hit on patrol.
I know some folks out there are still all about the "But it's druuuuuuugs it's bad for you! YA NEED JESUS!" But yar.
Discuss!
Is it the right drugs? Well we used to use a simple blood thinner to cure headaches, reduce pains, and other similar conditions. Probably wasn't the best thing to do, but it's Aspirin, right?