Moderator: Community Team
I'd tell them to f*ck off.Crazyirishman wrote:My college started a palm swipe program to access the dining halls as of recently to replace to old method of swiping your student id. They say that its going to be mandatory soon however I dont think they can legally force me to register my palm print. What do you guys think?
Most posters have. You sound suspicious.ManBungalow wrote:I've never posted in a conspiracy thread on this site.

jgordon1111 wrote:tell them your student I.D. isnt broken.and if your still required to have a student I.D. the palm scanner is moot
Crazyirishman wrote:My college started a palm swipe program to access the dining halls as of recently to replace to old method of swiping your student id. They say that its going to be mandatory soon however I dont think they can legally force me to register my palm print. What do you guys think?

Are you sure your numbers are right? $4,100 or $41,000 a year? Even if your numbers are right $4,100 is $11 and change each day of the year. I am sure they wouldn't mind if you dropped an extra 10 each day to make up for it. If the new system saves them the whole $4,100 a year is will take just over a year to recoup the expense. I think it is a good move.Crazyirishman wrote:They claim that it is to save money from people using other people ids to 'steal food' and that the university losees $4100 a year because of this, which probably would happen if they didnt overcharge for everything under the sun. I guess it never occured to them to have the cashiers look at the card to see if it matches the persons face, let alone that installing the system will cost 5k minimum and up to 15k. Its beyond asinine, especially for a public institution.

Crazyirishman wrote:My college started a palm swipe program to access the dining halls as of recently to replace to old method of swiping your student id. They say that its going to be mandatory soon however I dont think they can legally force me to register my palm print. What do you guys think?
Strife wrote:I hereby state Martin Ronne has inappropriately touched me. I would like to file charges against this sick bastard and expect he be sent to prison.
Evil Semp wrote:Are you sure your numbers are right? $4,100 or $41,000 a year? Even if your numbers are right $4,100 is $11 and change each day of the year. I am sure they wouldn't mind if you dropped an extra 10 each day to make up for it. If the new system saves them the whole $4,100 a year is will take just over a year to recoup the expense. I think it is a good move.Crazyirishman wrote:They claim that it is to save money from people using other people ids to 'steal food' and that the university losees $4100 a year because of this, which probably would happen if they didnt overcharge for everything under the sun. I guess it never occured to them to have the cashiers look at the card to see if it matches the persons face, let alone that installing the system will cost 5k minimum and up to 15k. Its beyond asinine, especially for a public institution.
As far a legal you probably signed a lot of papers when you enrolled and I am sure one of them would cover this new system.

And then there are maintenance costs, costs for scanning every student's palm, complaints along the lines of "WHY THE f*ck ISN'T THIS PIECE OF SHIT WORKING!?" whenever the scanner is too dirty to read anything properly. That's just off the top of my head.neanderpaul14 wrote:Also the $5,000 to $15,000 for a computerized print scanner sounds amazingly low.Evil Semp wrote:Are you sure your numbers are right? $4,100 or $41,000 a year? Even if your numbers are right $4,100 is $11 and change each day of the year. I am sure they wouldn't mind if you dropped an extra 10 each day to make up for it. If the new system saves them the whole $4,100 a year is will take just over a year to recoup the expense. I think it is a good move.Crazyirishman wrote:They claim that it is to save money from people using other people ids to 'steal food' and that the university losees $4100 a year because of this, which probably would happen if they didnt overcharge for everything under the sun. I guess it never occured to them to have the cashiers look at the card to see if it matches the persons face, let alone that installing the system will cost 5k minimum and up to 15k. Its beyond asinine, especially for a public institution.
As far a legal you probably signed a lot of papers when you enrolled and I am sure one of them would cover this new system.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
I had the same dilemma when my work required my fingerprints to punch in to the new time clock system back in around 1999. At first I just asked the boss about it a little bit and asked if there were any alternatives for people who did not wish to participate. Immediately and publicly, the boss man accused me of wearing a tin foil hat and fearing that next the corporation will want to put a microchip in my wrist. (Only later when I had his job did I realize he was coached to say these things, preferably in front of other new recruits.) I made a big stink about it and despite my boss doing everything he could to "legally" dissuade me from going to my union rep over it, the union got me a 6 digit punch in code. Everybody was jealous!Crazyirishman wrote:My college started a palm swipe program to access the dining halls as of recently to replace to old method of swiping your student id. They say that its going to be mandatory soon however I dont think they can legally force me to register my palm print. What do you guys think?
ahhhh!jgordon1111 wrote:most likely the cashier will be phased out,thus imagine the money they believe they will be saving in the long run.
Seems its only other people's unions you oppose.Phatscotty wrote: I made a big stink about it and despite my boss doing everything he could to "legally" dissuade me from going to my union rep over it, the union got me a 6 digit punch in code. Everybody was jealous!
.
Cmon Player, that is not the truth.PLAYER57832 wrote:Seems its only other people's unions you oppose.Phatscotty wrote: I made a big stink about it and despite my boss doing everything he could to "legally" dissuade me from going to my union rep over it, the union got me a 6 digit punch in code. Everybody was jealous!
.
