Abandoned challenges and other old information.
Moderator: Clan Directors
kuma32478
Posts: 1727 Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: North Carolina
Contact:
Post
by kuma32478 » Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:25 pm
Is there any interest in a war involving three clans.
Each clan would choose 20 home maps (terms negotiable) and the games would be doubles involving three teams. Basically it would be a 60 game war of three teams dubs games.
Any interest? Has it been done?
Last edited by
kuma32478 on Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
IcePack
Multi Hunter
Posts: 16851 Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: California
Post
by IcePack » Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:59 pm
BGtheBrain wrote: TNC is interested in this for sure.
We once did a 4-way war, but I cant find the thread
The 4 clan war was regular 1 clan vs 1 clan though. he is proposing:
team 1 = clan a
team 2 = clan b
team 3 = clan c
aka 6 player, 3 team dub game.
fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
kuma32478
Posts: 1727 Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: North Carolina
Contact:
Post
by kuma32478 » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:03 pm
Icepack has it exactly correct
Vid_FISO
Posts: 1351 Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 12:06 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Hants
Post
by Vid_FISO » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:03 pm
Not sure about the rest of the clan but it's something I'm definitely interested in
If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through
Vid_FISO
Posts: 1351 Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 12:06 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Hants
Post
by Vid_FISO » Wed Jul 03, 2013 3:43 pm
Just chucking in an idea - 3 players games? 5 home each? Takes out the need for a tie-breaker and could be incredibly weird play.
If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through
IcePack
Multi Hunter
Posts: 16851 Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: California
Post
by IcePack » Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:14 pm
Just an FYI as stated in the other multi clan war there's no current method to include this in F400
fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
NoSurvivors
Posts: 1479 Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 10:25 am
Post
by NoSurvivors » Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:56 pm
IcePack wrote: Just an FYI as stated in the other multi clan war there's no current method to include this in F400
Why not count it as 2 deprecate wars--
Winner (say wins 25 games)
Loser 1 (won 23 games
^ above is war 1.
Winner (wins 25 games)
Loser 2 (wins 12 games)
^ war 2.
Just a thought..
Last edited by
NoSurvivors on Wed Jul 03, 2013 5:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*Pixar*
Chatter
Posts: 1584 Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 2:15 pm
Gender: Male
Location: The Mitten
Post
by *Pixar* » Wed Jul 03, 2013 5:14 pm
IcePack
Multi Hunter
Posts: 16851 Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: California
Post
by IcePack » Wed Jul 03, 2013 7:09 pm
NoSurvivors wrote: IcePack wrote: Just an FYI as stated in the other multi clan war there's no current method to include this in F400
Why not count it as 2 deprecate wars--
Winner (say wins 25 games)
Loser 1 (won 23 games
^ above is war 1.
Winner (wins 25 games)
Loser 2 (wins 12 games)
^ war 2.
Just a thought..
Because doing that means the F400 thinks they've won 50 games. Not 25
fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
Gilligan
Posts: 12478 Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI
Post
by Gilligan » Wed Jul 03, 2013 7:36 pm
IcePack wrote: NoSurvivors wrote: IcePack wrote: Just an FYI as stated in the other multi clan war there's no current method to include this in F400
Why not count it as 2 deprecate wars--
Winner (say wins 25 games)
Loser 1 (won 23 games
^ above is war 1.
Winner (wins 25 games)
Loser 2 (wins 12 games)
^ war 2.
Just a thought..
Because doing that means the F400 thinks they've won 50 games. Not 25
Even so, I think that this is a great idea. Although I would hope it doesn't turn to double teaming in the end if one clan has a distinct advantage the others.
IcePack
Multi Hunter
Posts: 16851 Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: California
Post
by IcePack » Wed Jul 03, 2013 7:37 pm
Gilligan wrote: IcePack wrote: NoSurvivors wrote: IcePack wrote: Just an FYI as stated in the other multi clan war there's no current method to include this in F400
Why not count it as 2 deprecate wars--
Winner (say wins 25 games)
Loser 1 (won 23 games
^ above is war 1.
Winner (wins 25 games)
Loser 2 (wins 12 games)
^ war 2.
Just a thought..
Because doing that means the F400 thinks they've won 50 games. Not 25
Even so, I think that this is a great idea. Although I would hope it doesn't turn to double teaming in the end if one clan has a distinct advantage the others.
Yeah I think the idea is really fun. i just wanted to make it clear from the start, since the last one i caught halfway thru after people had asked.
IcePack
fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
NoSurvivors
Posts: 1479 Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 10:25 am
Post
by NoSurvivors » Sun Jul 07, 2013 10:02 pm
IcePack wrote: NoSurvivors wrote: IcePack wrote: Just an FYI as stated in the other multi clan war there's no current method to include this in F400
Why not count it as 2 deprecate wars--
Winner (say wins 25 games)
Loser 1 (won 23 games
^ above is war 1.
Winner (wins 25 games)
Loser 2 (wins 12 games)
^ war 2.
Just a thought..
Because doing that means the F400 thinks they've won 50 games. Not 25
Ah okay, don't really know how it all works :p gave it a shot hahah.
kuma32478
Posts: 1727 Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: North Carolina
Contact:
Post
by kuma32478 » Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:04 am
Perhaps a four team war may be the way to go to prevent double teaming.
Donelladan
Posts: 3692 Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:48 am
Post
by Donelladan » Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:14 am
LHDD might be interested, I will discuss it with my clan and give an answer soon.
kuma32478
Posts: 1727 Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: North Carolina
Contact:
Post
by kuma32478 » Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:14 am
Fiso expressed possible interest earlier
Donelladan
Posts: 3692 Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:48 am
Post
by Donelladan » Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:30 am
After discussion, LHDD isn't interested.
Vid_FISO
Posts: 1351 Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 12:06 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Hants
Post
by Vid_FISO » Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:30 am
kuma32478 wrote: Fiso expressed possible interest earlier
I'm sure I can persuade enough to play = basically I just send the invites and they join
Happy to discuss terms either openly or via 3-way pm
If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through
kuma32478
Posts: 1727 Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: North Carolina
Contact:
Post
by kuma32478 » Tue Jul 09, 2013 8:54 am
I'd vote for no Nukes. Tiebreaker is random map with standard sunny settings.
Also, why not just have one clan send out their 20 in RD1, another clan in RD2 and the final clan in RD3