UCAbear [busted]

UCAbears · Post by **UCAbears** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:01 pm

this guy is clearly an imposter...please check them out

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:06 pm

don't worry, we're on it.

OwlLawyer · Post by **OwlLawyer** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:07 pm

See, here is the problem... accusing "Any of the staches" when it is not all of us. Sure, accuse those whom you think are guilty, but just like any thread in here, lumping us all together is silly.

UCAbears · Post by **UCAbears** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:10 pm

ya are the only ones on this site that i have ever had a problem with.....does it look like i care

OwlLawyer · Post by **OwlLawyer** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:12 pm

Well, I am sure I will be accused of spamming here, but I am addressing the topic at hand:

I am guessing, based on moderator responses, that there are some in the group that were banned and created second names. But not all of us, or even a majority of us, did that. The problem is that you decide you dislike one, and then someone like Twill takes the irrational move to ban all of us. It's mob mentality.

As for someone creating multiple accounts, they should be dealt with. At least that is an actual violation of the terms of service.

UCAbears · Post by **UCAbears** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:15 pm

if one in the group is guilty they are all guilty...

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:17 pm

let's not have this argument here guys... UCA quit trying to instigate shit.

OwlLawyer · Post by **OwlLawyer** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:19 pm

I appreciate it wicked.

UCAbears · Post by **UCAbears** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:39 pm

why am i getting bitched at when I started this topic and he has to come start spaming it up...

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:41 pm

UCA, you asked for us to check into UCABear ... I responded we would ... no further need for discussion, ok?

edit: edited the title for clarity

UCAbears · Post by **UCAbears** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:43 pm

ok sorry wicked

Red Army · Post by **Red Army** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:52 pm

I think he was created by the staches.

How pathetic do you have to be to create multi accounts to say that you like yourself on a forum?

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:52 pm

UCAbears wrote:if one in the group is guilty they are all guilty...

So UCA, since mott was trying to form a private alliance and hes in your group you should be banned for a secret alliance... I can get behind that.

LemonPartyPatrol · Post by **LemonPartyPatrol** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:54 pm

reverend_kyle wrote:
UCAbears wrote:if one in the group is guilty they are all guilty...

So UCA, since mott was trying to form a private alliance and hes in your group you should be banned for a secret alliance... I can get behind that.

Tsk, tsk UCAbears. I second that motion!

OwlLawyer · Post by **OwlLawyer** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:56 pm

Red Army wrote:I think he was created by the staches.

How pathetic do you have to be to create multi accounts to say that you like yourself on a forum?

This is a flame and an accusation against our group, in an attempt to hijack this thread. Please refrain or the moderators will have to ban you. On top of that, this was not created by "the staches". If someone from the group created the account, it does not mean that others created it.

LemonPartyPatrol · Post by **LemonPartyPatrol** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:59 pm

OwlLawyer wrote:
Red Army wrote:I think he was created by the staches.

How pathetic do you have to be to create multi accounts to say that you like yourself on a forum?

This is a flame and an accusation against our group, in an attempt to hijack this thread. Please refrain or the moderators will have to ban you. On top of that, this was not created by "the staches". If someone from the group created the account, it does not mean that others created it.

Mod please band Red Army.

UCAbears · Post by **UCAbears** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:06 pm

look lemonade they are not going to go around baning everyone!lol

LemonPartyPatrol · Post by **LemonPartyPatrol** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:09 pm

reverend_kyle wrote:
UCAbears wrote:if one in the group is guilty they are all guilty...

So UCA, since mott was trying to form a private alliance and hes in your group you should be banned for a secret alliance... I can get behind that.

lol...lol....Well you should be...lol...lol..lol..banded at least Bearenstien..lol...lol...lol

LOL!!!1111!!!!!OMG1!!!!!WTF#$%!!!!!

UCAbears · Post by **UCAbears** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:10 pm

sorry to burst your bubble lemonade but im not getting banned just because you want me too

UCAbears · Post by **UCAbears** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:11 pm

mod please ban lemonade for hijacking and spaming my thread! lol wata loser

LemonPartyPatrol · Post by **LemonPartyPatrol** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:12 pm

UCAbears wrote:sorry to burst your bubble lemonade but im not getting banned just because you want me too

Okie dokie bearenstien....I just SECONDED a motion started by reverend_kyle. And I believe reverend_kyle has a point and I would like a Mod to look into this!

LemonPartyPatrol · Post by **LemonPartyPatrol** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:13 pm

Bearentien please post without using LOL once!

LOL

UCAbears · Post by **UCAbears** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:14 pm

look into me doing what? posting on a thread? haha yea right

LemonPartyPatrol · Post by **LemonPartyPatrol** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:17 pm

reverend_kyle wrote:
UCAbears wrote:if one in the group is guilty they are all guilty...

So UCA, since mott was trying to form a private alliance and hes in your group you should be banned for a secret alliance... I can get behind that.

^^ Into this ^^

UCAbears · Post by **UCAbears** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:20 pm

go ahead even though i had nothing to do with it id love to see what the mods do...lolololololololololololololololololol...stop spamming my thread