Moderator: Community Team
More the second one, really. Your reasons for being your favorite could include the first, though.thegreekdog wrote:What do you mean by "greatest"? Most powerful or a personal favorite?
Though to be fair, I was never much into comic books or the super hero stuff, I was watching shows on archeology and reading chapter books since the 3rd grade.muy_thaiguy wrote:I'd say Wolverine. 150 years old, and doesn't look a day over 25, can heal from pretty much anything thrown at him, and the adamantium bones/claws make him virtually indestructible.
Not being a comic book buff doesn't mean you can't have an opinion. To be honest, I included Wolverine because I know a lot of people who don't read comics but still think Wolverine is a badass.muy_thaiguy wrote:Though to be fair, I was never much into comic books or the super hero stuff, I was watching shows on archeology and reading chapter books since the 3rd grade.muy_thaiguy wrote:I'd say Wolverine. 150 years old, and doesn't look a day over 25, can heal from pretty much anything thrown at him, and the adamantium bones/claws make him virtually indestructible.
Roland would be right up there if he can be counted as a superhero. Of course, that raises questions of what it takes to qualify one as a superhero.luns101 wrote:As an avid reader of Stephen King's Dark Tower stories, I would choose Roland Deschain. Some people might argue that he's not a superhero, but Marvel comics did recently start converting his character & story to comic book format.
Otherwise, I'll go with Superman...and if you still disagree with that then "Great Ceasar's Ghost" to you
You aren't badass if you're invincible. That's like calling Internet tough-guys badass.Frigidus wrote:Not being a comic book buff doesn't mean you can't have an opinion. To be honest, I included Wolverine because I know a lot of people who don't read comics but still think Wolverine is a badass.muy_thaiguy wrote:Though to be fair, I was never much into comic books or the super hero stuff, I was watching shows on archeology and reading chapter books since the 3rd grade.muy_thaiguy wrote:I'd say Wolverine. 150 years old, and doesn't look a day over 25, can heal from pretty much anything thrown at him, and the adamantium bones/claws make him virtually indestructible.
Indeed. I mean, at least Superman has a weakness that can be exploited more than once.InkL0sed wrote:You aren't badass if you're invincible. That's like calling Internet tough-guys badass.Frigidus wrote:Not being a comic book buff doesn't mean you can't have an opinion. To be honest, I included Wolverine because I know a lot of people who don't read comics but still think Wolverine is a badass.muy_thaiguy wrote:Though to be fair, I was never much into comic books or the super hero stuff, I was watching shows on archeology and reading chapter books since the 3rd grade.muy_thaiguy wrote:I'd say Wolverine. 150 years old, and doesn't look a day over 25, can heal from pretty much anything thrown at him, and the adamantium bones/claws make him virtually indestructible.
But he still feels the pain, so he is a badass.InkL0sed wrote:You aren't badass if you're invincible. That's like calling Internet tough-guys badass.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
I was an avid fan of the Gunslinger series (even after having to wait 20 fooking years between 3 and 4) until Susannah's Song. The Wolves of the Callah was simply a generic ripoff of The Magnificent Seven (which was a ripoff of the 7 Samurai), but Susannah's Song was one of the worst books i have ever read. The only Steven King book that was worse was "Gerald's Game", which outstrips all other books by anyone for the worst read ever. Finally, the Dark Tower was about as anticlimatic as a conclusion can get, and the idea of incorporating himself into the book was gawdawful cheesy. Books 2-4 were great, and the rest was trash. Roland was a great character though.luns101 wrote:As an avid reader of Stephen King's Dark Tower stories, I would choose Roland Deschain. Some people might argue that he's not a superhero, but Marvel comics did recently start converting his character & story to comic book format.
Otherwise, I'll go with Superman...and if you still disagree with that then "Great Ceasar's Ghost" to you
Oh, and The Spirit. You may say he's not a superhero, but if he's not then nor is Batman.jonesthecurl wrote:It varies, depending on who's writing/drawing the character at any one time. Also whether you're talking comic, movie, TV series.
At different times, my favourites have been
Daredevil
Impulse
Marvelman
Invincible
Swamp Thing
Batman
The Tick
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
May not in the traditional sense but yes. At least an Anti-hero anyways. But better choice than Aquaman and probably better than squirrel girl.jonesthecurl wrote:Rorschach was a hero?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
I think she was from an internet comic i used to read...b.k. barunt wrote:Was there really a squirrel girl? I voted for her cause the name had a ring to it and evoked erotic images that were quite strange, but i never heard of her before this. What was her super power? Nutcracking?
Honibaz
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.