Moderator: Tournament Directors
iamkoolerthanu wrote:I'd co-direct, if needed. And it sounds like a good idea, although makeing two divisions makes things a bit crazy, at least I think so. I tend to pass by the ones that I see saying 'x amount of points and up', because what happens when I join and I lose some games elsewhere, then I am down below that, and things like that. I am always open for new ideas though.
Gilligan wrote:I really don't like the score setup. Optimus and Gozar did that with CCC Masters, and in the Under 900 Division, some of the early signups already moved halfway up the ranks, making a person with 1600 points in a tournament with people under 900.

Optimus Prime wrote:How are you going to handle the sign-ups for new players each month on this one? I just have a feeling that while a consistent tournament each month is a nice idea, it could fall apart pretty quickly after just a couple of months.
Each one is going to last about 6-8 weeks at least, which means that after a few months you are going to be keeping track of at least 2 or 3, if not more of them at a time. That is going to get time consuming and prevent you from running other tournaments at the same time.
Regards, Optimus Prime
Optimus Prime wrote:Well, let's see. Most of the current ones that are series tend to have pretty generic names such as Point Grabbers or "You're Eliminated". That allows them to use pretty much whatever maps or settings they want without dulling the interest.
My first suggestion would be to fine tune your format to something that you really like and that you think would be liked, and then come up with the name for it.